win-loss-analysis
From the author
Build a neutral B2B win-loss program that interviews recent buyers, codes decision drivers and sentiment, separates buyer evidence from CRM opinion, and produces a recurring insight report plus owned GTM actions. Use when a team needs to understand why deals are won, lost, stalled, or displaced by competitors.
Install
npx skills add LeadMagic/gtm-skills --skill win-loss-analysis -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/win-loss-analysis/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 76
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- competitive-win-loss-analysisLMTYdotcom/skillsExplain repeated competitive outcomes - why deals are won or lost against a competitor or across a period - from buyer and deal evidence rather than rep folklore, with the cohort defined, buyer-stated reasons separated from rep-entered ones, patterns counted without erasing the cases that contradict them, sample size and bias labeled, and hypotheses to test instead of invented causes. Use for "why are we losing to X", "analyze our wins and losses", "what do buyers actually say when they choose them", "is this objection really costing us deals", and any question about outcomes across more than one deal. Not for one competitor's public profile, one deal's prep, or one objection's response.Testing★ 83
- win-loss-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsAnalyze recently closed opportunities to find patterns in what wins and what loses - stage of loss, common objections from transcripts, deal characteristics. Leader-focused. Use when the user asks "win loss review", "why are we losing deals", "what's working", or "analyze closed opps".OfficialEngineering★ 32.8K
- competitive-intelalirezarezvani/claude-skillsSystematic competitor tracking that feeds CMO positioning, CRO battlecards, and CPO roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building sales battlecards, tracking market moves, positioning against alternatives, or when user mentions competitive intelligence, competitive analysis, competitor research, battlecards, win/loss, or market positioning.Science★ 28.7K
- pipeline-managementLeadMagic/gtm-skillsDesign and manage B2B sales processes using Winning by Design's GTM Playbook Kit — stage goals, in-stage actions, exit criteria, SPICED qualification fields, conversion metrics, Bowtie handoffs, forecasting, and deal inspection cadences. Use when designing sales process stages, building a GTM playbook, improving forecast accuracy, or setting up pipeline reviews. Triggers on: "sales process design", "GTM playbook", "pipeline management", "deal stages", "Winning by Design process", "SPICED stages", "forecasting", "deal inspection", "CRM hygiene".Design★ 68
- competitive-intelligenceanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsCompetitive analysis two ways - the in-deal play against a named competitor, and win/loss patterns, competitor mentions, and battlecards across the book. Use when the user asks "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "what's new with [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", "how do we beat [competitor]", "what's the play against [competitor] in [deal]", "where are we losing to [competitor]", "win/loss patterns", "competitive analysis", "refresh the battlecards", or on a weekly schedule.OfficialScience★ 32.8K
- customer-researchcbrock84/headcountPlans, runs, and synthesizes customer research — interviews, surveys, win-loss analysis, and message testing — into findings that change decisions. Use this when the customer is being guessed at, before positioning or a major launch, when churn or conversion has an unexplained cause, or when a team is arguing from anecdotes. Also use to turn raw interview notes into usable findings.Science★ 2.1K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in