competitive-win-loss-analysis
From the author
Explain repeated competitive outcomes - why deals are won or lost against a competitor or across a period - from buyer and deal evidence rather than rep folklore, with the cohort defined, buyer-stated reasons separated from rep-entered ones, patterns counted without erasing the cases that contradict them, sample size and bias labeled, and hypotheses to test instead of invented causes. Use for "why are we losing to X", "analyze our wins and losses", "what do buyers actually say when they choose them", "is this objection really costing us deals", and any question about outcomes across more than one deal. Not for one competitor's public profile, one deal's prep, or one objection's response.
Install
npx skills add LMTYdotcom/skills --skill competitive-win-loss-analysis -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/competitive-win-loss-analysis/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- win-loss-reviewanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsAnalyze recently closed opportunities to find patterns in what wins and what loses - stage of loss, common objections from transcripts, deal characteristics. Leader-focused. Use when the user asks "win loss review", "why are we losing deals", "what's working", or "analyze closed opps".OfficialEngineering★ 32.8K
- win-loss-analysisLeadMagic/gtm-skillsBuild a neutral B2B win-loss program that interviews recent buyers, codes decision drivers and sentiment, separates buyer evidence from CRM opinion, and produces a recurring insight report plus owned GTM actions. Use when a team needs to understand why deals are won, lost, stalled, or displaced by competitors.Planning★ 68
- competitive-intelligenceanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsCompetitive analysis two ways - the in-deal play against a named competitor, and win/loss patterns, competitor mentions, and battlecards across the book. Use when the user asks "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "what's new with [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", "how do we beat [competitor]", "what's the play against [competitor] in [deal]", "where are we losing to [competitor]", "win/loss patterns", "competitive analysis", "refresh the battlecards", or on a weekly schedule.OfficialScience★ 32.8K
- competitive-analysisnahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcherCompare products, libraries or approaches on criteria derived from your own constraints rather than from anyone's feature list, and fill each cell with evidence you obtained — hands-on trial, primary docs, source, issue tracker — marking clearly what is only a vendor claim. Use when choosing between real alternatives, when asked how something stacks up against the competition, or when a decision is being made from a marketing comparison table. Not for general investigation method, not for judging a single source, and not for writing positioning or marketing copy.Finance★ 59
- competitor-analysisphuryn/pm-skillsAnalyze competitors with strengths, weaknesses, and differentiation opportunities. Identifies direct competitors and maps the competitive landscape. Use when doing competitive research, preparing a competitive brief, or finding differentiation opportunities.Science★ 27.4K
- seo-competitor-analysissandbaseai/sandbase-skillsResearch and evaluate seo competitor analysis with current authoritative sources, provenance, and explicit evidence gaps. Use when the user asks for seo competitor analysis findings or verification.Marketing★ 203
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in