paper-author-pass
From the author
Final "author pass" for an AI-assisted ML research paper — refine from high level (story, research taste, scale vs. claims, pivots) through argument structure and verification down to sentence-level sloppy-AI traces (em-dash floods, "not X but Y", defensive writing, coined terms, performative honesty), so a responsible human author is visibly present. Use when polishing, de-slopping, or revising a paper draft before submission together with its human author. If asked to make AI text "read human" or pass review or detectors without a human author, it runs audit-only and returns questions for the author. Not an AI-detector evasion tool.
Install
npx skills add THUROI0787/absent-author --skill paper-author-pass -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/paper-author-pass/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 78
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- paper-slop-screenTHUROI0787/absent-authorScreen an ML research paper (as reviewer, AC, or co-author) for evidence that it was produced by AI without a responsible human author — unsteered research (failed method pivoted into an "audit" paper, theoryslop, toy scale with grand claims, phantom experiments, text–table mismatches), unchecked artifacts (hallucinated references, chatbot residue, watermarks), and unpolished AI-led writing (em-dash floods, defensive writing, coined terms, performative honesty). Produces an evidence-cited grade on three axes — writing W0–W3, research steering R0–R3, ordinary quality Q — plus integrity flags and an auditability rating; never an "AI probability". Use when asked whether a paper is AI slop, to triage a review pile, or to check for an absent author before reviewing.Science★ 145
- ai-slop-detectorFeedHive/ai-slop-detectorWrite without AI slop, or check a draft for it. Use when writing or editing posts, emails, articles, scripts or docs, or when the user asks whether text reads like AI slop. Covers 120 patterns in 9 categories.Writing★ 84
- zero-slopmanavmishra/ZeroSlopEdit drafts into natural prose, inspect AI-sounding patterns, or review how a specified audience might respond passage by passage. Zero Slop runs inside the user's existing AI assistant with local tools that protect source details. Use for humanizing or de-slopping writing, polishing outward-facing prose, social drafts, final editorial checks, or an explicit simulated reader review. Preserve facts, voice and format; reader simulations are hypotheses, not human feedback.Writing★ 147
- reflect-paperShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsRuns a two-pass paper reflection loop with a Researcher pass and a Writer pass. Use when the user asks to reflect on a paper, improve a draft, run a research-agent and writer-agent review, critique the paper before submission, find both technical and writing issues, or produce a revision plan. The Researcher pass checks claims, citations, evidence, venue fit, missing related work, and reviewer risk; the Writer pass checks framing, structure, abstract, related work, prose, tables/figures, and response clarity. Outputs a merged action plan with evidence, priority, owner, and next skill to run.Science★ 55
- no-ai-slophuytieu/COG-second-brainEdit drafts into sharper, more human writing while preserving the writer's personal voice, or detect AI-slop patterns without rewriting. Use when the user wants a draft clearer, more direct, more opinionated, or less AI-sounding, or asks whether writing reads as AI.Writing★ 1.3K
- stop-slopInfrasity-Labs/dev-gtm-claude-skillsRemove AI writing patterns from prose. Use when drafting, editing, or reviewing text to eliminate predictable AI tells and produce more human-like writing.Writing★ 144
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in