reflect-paper
From the author
Runs a two-pass paper reflection loop with a Researcher pass and a Writer pass. Use when the user asks to reflect on a paper, improve a draft, run a research-agent and writer-agent review, critique the paper before submission, find both technical and writing issues, or produce a revision plan. The Researcher pass checks claims, citations, evidence, venue fit, missing related work, and reviewer risk; the Writer pass checks framing, structure, abstract, related work, prose, tables/figures, and response clarity. Outputs a merged action plan with evidence, priority, owner, and next skill to run.
Install
npx skills add ShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skills --skill reflect-paper -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/reflect-paper/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- reflect-and-improveShaishavMaisuria/research-paper-lifecycle-skillsThe reflection agent. Use it right after another skill produces an artifact such as a rewrite from polish-prose, a rebuttal, an abstract, a preflight fix, or a tailored draft to critique that output against the stated goal, the paper's .paper-memory/profile.yml, the relevant rubric, and past .paper-memory/lessons.md, then decide whether it actually improved. Trigger words include reflect, self-critique, did this get better, did my edit help, regression check, review my own output, iterate, refine, second pass, sanity-check the rewrite, and "is the new version actually better". Runs a bounded self-refine / Reflexion loop, guards against regressions, and appends durable, deduplicated, dated lessons to .paper-memory/lessons.md via a stdlib script so the toolkit gets sharper each paper. Reflection adds cost; it only pays off when there is a measurable target.Science★ 55
- paper-reviewbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when a paper is complete or near-complete and a holistic pre-submission audit is needed. Cross-cuts text, code, tables, figures, results, citations, and reproducibility in a single pass and produces a persistent audit report. Works standalone on papers written outside the plugin.Science★ 4.8K
- paper-author-passTHUROI0787/absent-authorFinal "author pass" for an AI-assisted ML research paper — refine from high level (story, research taste, scale vs. claims, pivots) through argument structure and verification down to sentence-level sloppy-AI traces (em-dash floods, "not X but Y", defensive writing, coined terms, performative honesty), so a responsible human author is visibly present. Use when polishing, de-slopping, or revising a paper draft before submission together with its human author. If asked to make AI text "read human" or pass review or detectors without a human author, it runs audit-only and returns questions for the author. Not an AI-detector evasion tool.Science★ 145
- respond-to-refereespedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowGenerate a structured response-to-referees document from a referee report and the revised manuscript. Maps each referee comment to the specific revision, classifies coverage (addressed / partially / deferred / disagreement), and drafts polite but firm responses. Use during the R&R (revise-and-resubmit) stage of paper revision.Science★ 1.7K
- paper-referee-revisebrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsRevise an academic paper based on journal referee reports. Reads referee comments from review report or annotated manuscript, then directly modifies main.tex one comment at a time with user approval. Generates response letter after revision. Trigger when user says "referee revise" / "paper-referee-revise" / "审稿意见修改" / "根据审稿人意见修改" / "referee report".Science★ 4.8K
- reflectuzairansaruzi/p3-stackDelegate three parallel reviewers over the active thread, surface learnings, and route each to a concrete edit on an existing skill. Use when the user says reflect.Writing★ 156
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in