aiqbench analysis
This study establishes noise-robust no-go theorems proving that strong signatures of the uncertainty principle cannot be simulated by a single measurement, even with quantum pre- or post-processing. The authors characterize complementary instruments as the necessary and sufficient resources for achieving specific quantum advantages in operational tasks. These findings clarify the fundamental limits of simulating quantum features, distinguishing genuine quantum advantages from those reproducible via less resourceful methods.
No-go theorems on simulating uncertainty principle's signatures
arXiv:2606.05884v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Uncertainty principle, one of the most iconic features of quantum mechanics, was originally viewed as a fundamental limitation. Since the inception of quantum information science, researchers began to use it to achieve quantum advantages. To better understand the origin of these advantages, an essential question is: To what extent can the uncertainty principle's signatures be simulated by a single measurement? As a single measurement clearly cannot demonstrate the uncertainty principle, such a simulation, if exists, implies the claimed advantages may either stem from other quantum features, or just be reproducible in a less resourceful way. In this work, we report a series of noise-robust no-go theorems, showing that strong enough signatures of uncertainty principle cannot be simulated by a single measurement, even when assisted by quantum pre- or post-processing. This signature is modelled by complementary instruments. We completely characterise complementary instruments by a numerically feasible measure and show that they are necessary and sufficient resources for the advantage in an operational task that aims to unambiguously send classical information.
Abstract:Uncertainty principle, one of the most iconic features of quantum mechanics, was originally viewed as a fundamental limitation. Since the inception of quantum information science, researchers began to use it to achieve quantum advantages. To better understand the origin of these advantages, an essential question is: To what extent can the uncertainty principle's signatures be simulated by a single measurement? As a single measurement clearly cannot demonstrate the uncertainty principle, such a simulation, if exists, implies the claimed advantages may either stem from other quantum features, or just be reproducible in a less resourceful way. In this work, we report a series of noise-robust no-go theorems, showing that strong enough signatures of uncertainty principle cannot be simulated by a single measurement, even when assisted by quantum pre- or post-processing. This signature is modelled by complementary instruments. We completely characterise complementary instruments by a numerically feasible measure and show that they are necessary and sufficient resources for the advantage in an operational task that aims to unambiguously send classical information.
arXiv:2606.05884 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2606.05884v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.05884 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 260 words
Related coverage
Uncertainty Quantification for AI-Driven Crash Simulation Surrogates: A Comparative Study of Monte Carlo Dropout and Deep Ensemble on Open-Source Bumper Beam Benchmark
arXiv · Jul 22, 2026
Uncertainty-Aware Selection of Online Algorithms with Simulator Ensembles
arXiv · Sep 30, 2026

Technical University of Munich achieves quantum simulations with a margin of error
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 21, 2026
Uncertainty-Aware Simulation-Based Inference for Operations Research with Large Language Models
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026