Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces an uncertainty-aware selection method using simulator ensembles to improve online reinforcement learning, specifically addressing reliability issues when offline training data is limited. By averaging performance across bootstrap-resampled simulators rather than relying on a single fitted model, the approach theoretically reduces regret in multi-armed bandits and empirically enhances robotic control tasks. The work offers a robust framework for mitigating distribution shift and improving hyperparameter selection in deep RL systems.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Uncertainty-Aware Selection of Online Algorithms with Simulator Ensembles

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.32170v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The performance of online reinforcement learning depends critically on design choices, especially those that affect exploration. These choices are often selected by fitting a simulator to offline data, evaluating candidate algorithms in that simulator, and deploying the best-performing one. The simplest Plug-In selection rule simply selects the best performing algorithm on the fitted simulator, making evaluations unreliable when the offline data used to fit the simulator are limited. We investigate Uncertainty-Aware selection, which forms an ensemble of simulators---for example, obtained by bootstrap resampling---and selects the online algorithm with the best average performance across the ensemble. While ensemble-based approaches have been used to mitigate distribution shift and facilitate sim-to-real transfer, we formally show that this approach can mitigate the effects of limited data when fitting the simulator and theoretically has significant regret gains compared to Plug-In selection in multi-armed bandits. We also empirically investigate the Uncertainty-Aware selection approach in deep RL experiments on robotic control tasks that involve selecting reward-shaping hyperparameters, and show that it leads to more reliable selection and improved online performance.

Abstract:The performance of online reinforcement learning depends critically on design choices, especially those that affect exploration. These choices are often selected by fitting a simulator to offline data, evaluating candidate algorithms in that simulator, and deploying the best-performing one. The simplest Plug-In selection rule simply selects the best performing algorithm on the fitted simulator, making evaluations unreliable when the offline data used to fit the simulator are limited. We investigate Uncertainty-Aware selection, which forms an ensemble of simulators---for example, obtained by bootstrap resampling---and selects the online algorithm with the best average performance across the ensemble. While ensemble-based approaches have been used to mitigate distribution shift and facilitate sim-to-real transfer, we formally show that this approach can mitigate the effects of limited data when fitting the simulator and theoretically has significant regret gains compared to Plug-In selection in multi-armed bandits. We also empirically investigate the Uncertainty-Aware selection approach in deep RL experiments on robotic control tasks that involve selecting reward-shaping hyperparameters, and show that it leads to more reliable selection and improved online performance.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2609.32170 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2609.32170v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.32170 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 270 words

Related coverage