Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Comms

aiqbench analysis

This article investigates the comparative advantages of SU(1,1) versus conventional SU(2) interferometers in detecting spacetime fluctuations to probe fundamental gravity theories. By calculating quantum and classical Fisher information across various measurement schemes, it assesses whether non-classical light sources offer superior sensitivity for estimating fluctuation strength or correlation length compared to standard setups. The study provides a rigorous theoretical framework relevant to high-precision metrology experiments aiming to uncover signatures of random spacetime geometry variations.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Estimating spacetime fluctuation strength in SU(1,1) and SU(2) interferometers

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.00907v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: High-precision laser interferometers are commonly used to search for signatures of random spacetime fluctuations, in an attempt to understand the fundamental nature of gravity. Conventionally, $SU(2)$ interferometers have been used in such experimental investigations. Motivated by [K. Zheng \textit{et al.}, Photon. Res. \textbf{8}, 1653 (2020)], I assess if there is any advantage to be gained by using an $SU(1,1)$ interferometer instead of the $SU(2)$ interferometer. To this end, I compute the quantum Fisher information for estimating the strength and the correlation length of the spacetime fluctuations, and the corresponding classical Fisher information considering different experimentally relevant measurement schemes, in both types of interferometers. I compare the information metrics corresponding to different parameter regimes that are relevant to both current and possible future experimental setups. This helps me assess if and when the $SU(1,1)$ interferometer offers any advantage over the $SU(2)$ interferometer for estimating either the fluctuation strength or correlation length of the spacetime fluctuations.

Abstract:High-precision laser interferometers are commonly used to search for signatures of random spacetime fluctuations, in an attempt to understand the fundamental nature of gravity. Conventionally, $SU(2)$ interferometers have been used in such experimental investigations. Motivated by [K. Zheng \textit{et al.}, Photon. Res. \textbf{8}, 1653 (2020)], I assess if there is any advantage to be gained by using an $SU(1,1)$ interferometer instead of the $SU(2)$ interferometer. To this end, I compute the quantum Fisher information for estimating the strength and the correlation length of the spacetime fluctuations, and the corresponding classical Fisher information considering different experimentally relevant measurement schemes, in both types of interferometers. I compare the information metrics corresponding to different parameter regimes that are relevant to both current and possible future experimental setups. This helps me assess if and when the $SU(1,1)$ interferometer offers any advantage over the $SU(2)$ interferometer for estimating either the fluctuation strength or correlation length of the spacetime fluctuations.

arXiv:2608.00907 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2608.00907v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00907 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 245 words

Related coverage