fact-review
From the author
【L0 事实核验】白描 · 事实核查型审稿——只问「说的是不是真的」。以领域资深评审身份,查资料核实事实、数据、引文、论证与规范冲突,挑出捏造和站不住的细节,每处写明依据与出处,查不到就说查不到。默认只出审稿报告,不改稿。 触发:事实核查、查证、核实、审稿、评审、这篇有没有编、引文是真的吗、数据对不对、标书审查、论文查证、报告核实、有没有捏造、经不起推敲、fact check、fact review。 EN: "fact check this", "verify these claims", "review this paper", "are these citations real", "is this data correct"。 Not for / 不适用:风格去 AI 味(→ L1 plainspoken-writing)、有没有干货/逻辑/立场(→ L0 chinese-write-checker)、直接改写(→ L2 editor-revisor)、标题/排版/标点(→ L3 packaging-workshop)。
Install
npx skills add taxueseek/plainspoken-writing --skill fact-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/fact-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- fact-checkskillmds/skillmdSemi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".Science★ 190
- chinese-write-checkertaxueseek/plainspoken-writing中文内容质量验收工具,写作系列总入口(网关)。从编辑、读者、作者、平台四个视角对一篇中文稿件做全面体检(16 项),输出评分+问题清单+路由推荐。不改稿,只验收+路由。 触发:帮我看看这篇写得怎么样、这篇有没有问题、检查一下这篇文章、这篇稿子合格吗、帮我审一遍、文章质量验收、中文写作诊断、这篇能不能发、稿子需要改什么、怎么改。 EN: "review my Chinese article", "check this article quality", "Chinese writing diagnosis", "proofread this piece", "is this article good enough"。 Not for / 不适用:直接改写(→ plainspoken-writing / editor-revisor)、只改标题/排版/标点(→ packaging-workshop)、找不到自己声音(→ voice-dissolver)、事实/数据/引文真假核实(→ L0 fact-review)。Writing★ 68
- fact-checkernaveedharri/benai-skillsSystematic fact verification and misinformation identification using evidence-based analysis. Use when: verifying claims, checking facts, identifying misinformation, evaluating source credibility, or when user asks to "fact check", "verify", "is this true", or mentions claims that need validation.Other★ 74
- blog-factcheckAgriciDaniel/claude-blogVerify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".Writing★ 2.5K
- plainspoken-writingtaxueseek/plainspoken-writing【L1 声音真实度】白描 · AI 味检测与改写——只处理「像不像真人」。25 种 AI 味模式识别,根据严重程度选策略。默认只诊断不改,改写要用户确认。三种改写方式:自动替换、追问驱动、混合。可接收 voice-dissolver 声音清单作为保护区。 触发:AI味、像机器写的、太正式、读起来假、去AI味、AI感太重、像ChatGPT写的、太模板化、语气太标准、缺乏个性、AI腔、读起来没温度、句式太整齐、总结陈词、翻译腔、不说人话、套路化、白描、直陈白描、Plainspoken。 Not for:内容质量不够但没AI味(→ L0 chinese-write-checker)、结构冗余/废话多(→ L2 editor-revisor)、找不到自己声音(→ voice-dissolver)、排版/标点/标题(→ L3 packaging-workshop)、事实/数据/引文真假(→ L0 fact-review)。Writing★ 68
- fact-checkingseb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skillsVerify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.Productivity★ 229
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in