fact-review
De la autor
【L0 事实核验】白描 · 事实核查型审稿——只问「说的是不是真的」。以领域资深评审身份，查资料核实事实、数据、引文、论证与规范冲突，挑出捏造和站不住的细节，每处写明依据与出处，查不到就说查不到。默认只出审稿报告，不改稿。 触发：事实核查、查证、核实、审稿、评审、这篇有没有编、引文是真的吗、数据对不对、标书审查、论文查证、报告核实、有没有捏造、经不起推敲、fact check、fact review。 EN: "fact check this", "verify these claims", "review this paper", "are these citations real", "is this data correct"。 Not for / 不适用：风格去 AI 味（→ L1 plainspoken-writing）、有没有干货/逻辑/立场（→ L0 chinese-write-checker）、直接改写（→ L2 editor-revisor）、标题/排版/标点（→ L3 packaging-workshop）。
Instalare
npx skills add taxueseek/plainspoken-writing --skill fact-review -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/fact-review/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 82
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- fact-checkskillmds/skillmdSemi-automated fact-checking, source credibility evaluation, misinformation detection, prebunking, and evidence-ledger based claim verification. Use when a user asks to verify a claim, article, social post, screenshot, URL, quote, data point, compare sources, detect manipulation, evaluate source reliability, or generate an HTML fact-check card/share-safe correction. Supports text, URLs, screenshots/images, two-source comparison, and topic-level prebunking in Bulgarian, English, Russian, EU policy, health, science, and geopolitical contexts. Trigger phrases: "is this true?", "is this fake?", "fact check this", "compare these sources", "проверка на факти", "истина ли е", "дезинформация ли е", "сравни тези източници".Știință★ 190
- chinese-write-checkertaxueseek/plainspoken-writing中文内容质量验收工具，写作系列总入口（网关）。从编辑、读者、作者、平台四个视角对一篇中文稿件做全面体检（16 项），输出评分+问题清单+路由推荐。不改稿，只验收+路由。 触发：帮我看看这篇写得怎么样、这篇有没有问题、检查一下这篇文章、这篇稿子合格吗、帮我审一遍、文章质量验收、中文写作诊断、这篇能不能发、稿子需要改什么、怎么改。 EN: "review my Chinese article", "check this article quality", "Chinese writing diagnosis", "proofread this piece", "is this article good enough"。 Not for / 不适用：直接改写（→ plainspoken-writing / editor-revisor）、只改标题/排版/标点（→ packaging-workshop）、找不到自己声音（→ voice-dissolver）、事实/数据/引文真假核实（→ L0 fact-review）。Redactare★ 68
- fact-checkernaveedharri/benai-skillsSystematic fact verification and misinformation identification using evidence-based analysis. Use when: verifying claims, checking facts, identifying misinformation, evaluating source credibility, or when user asks to "fact check", "verify", "is this true", or mentions claims that need validation.Altele★ 73
- blog-factcheckAgriciDaniel/claude-blogVerify statistics and claims in blog posts by fetching cited source URLs and checking if the claimed data actually appears on the page. Extracts all load-bearing claims (statistics, product or policy claims, ranking and comparative claims, named sources), validates cited URLs before fetching, and scores match confidence (exact match 1.0, paraphrase 0.7-0.9, not found 0.0). Flags uncited claims as UNVERIFIED. Use when user says "fact check", "verify statistics", "check sources", "validate claims", "factcheck", "source verification".Redactare★ 2.5K
- fact-checkingseb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skillsVerify the accuracy of claims and statements by extracting individual assertions, identifying authoritative sources, cross-referencing evidence, and assigning confidence-scored verdicts. Use when the user requests fact checking or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.Productivitate★ 228
- slop-reviewAgriciDaniel/anti-slopRead-only slop review of prose, documentation, reports, agent output, commit messages or PR descriptions. Use when someone asks what is wrong with a draft, asks for an editorial or quality review, asks whether text is padded, vague, puffed up, unsourced or hollow, or asks whether writing "sounds like AI". Produces a fixed findings report where every finding carries a verbatim quote, a severity (HIGH for a fabricated fact, citation or API, MEDIUM for padding or filler that changes nothing if cut, LOW for stylistic tells) and a separate confidence (low, medium, high), plus the artifact from the structural test that produced it. This skill diagnoses only. It cannot write or edit files, it never rewrites the text it is judging, and it never states or implies who or what wrote the text. Hand its findings to slop-rewrite when the user wants repair.Inginerie★ 64
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te