ai-check
From the author
Use when someone asks "does this sound AI?", "check if this is AI-written", "what gives this away as AI", "run ai-check on this", or "score this text". Also use when reviewing a draft for AI tells before publishing, or when a piece of text reads as suspiciously polished, generic, or pattern-y and the user wants a forensic breakdown of why.
Install
npx skills add harshaneel/humanize --skill ai-check -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/ai-check/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 84
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- voice-checkerbitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skillsReviews lyrics and prose for AI-written patterns (abstract noun stacking, over-explained metaphors, cliche escalation, missing idiosyncrasy, prose AI tells). Advisory Warning/Info severity — flags issues, does not block or rewrite. Use when reviewing lyrics for authenticity or before generation to catch AI-sounding language.Writing★ 580
- ai-securityborghei/Claude-SkillsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "scan AI systems for security threats", "check for prompt injection vulnerabilities", "assess model security posture", "detect data poisoning risks", or "audit AI/ML pipeline security".Security★ 969
- grammar-checkphuryn/pm-skillsIdentify grammar, logical, and flow errors in text and suggest targeted fixes without rewriting the entire text. Use when proofreading content, checking writing quality, or reviewing a draft.Writing★ 27.3K
- writetw93/WazaRewrites and polishes Chinese or English prose, technical instructions, and product copy. Use when drafting, editing, localizing, or cutting AI tone. Not for code comments or commit messages.Writing★ 7.4K
- ai-code-reviewmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsReview AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.Engineering★ 1.5K
- review-a-designinkeep/open-knowledgeReviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).Design★ 4.7K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in