ai-check
De la autor
Use when someone asks "does this sound AI?", "check if this is AI-written", "what gives this away as AI", "run ai-check on this", or "score this text". Also use when reviewing a draft for AI tells before publishing, or when a piece of text reads as suspiciously polished, generic, or pattern-y and the user wants a forensic breakdown of why.
Instalare
npx skills add harshaneel/humanize --skill ai-check -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/ai-check/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 84
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- voice-checkerbitwize-music-studio/claude-ai-music-skillsReviews lyrics and prose for AI-written patterns (abstract noun stacking, over-explained metaphors, cliche escalation, missing idiosyncrasy, prose AI tells). Advisory Warning/Info severity — flags issues, does not block or rewrite. Use when reviewing lyrics for authenticity or before generation to catch AI-sounding language.Redactare★ 580
- ai-securityborghei/Claude-SkillsThis skill should be used when the user asks to "scan AI systems for security threats", "check for prompt injection vulnerabilities", "assess model security posture", "detect data poisoning risks", or "audit AI/ML pipeline security".Securitate★ 969
- grammar-checkphuryn/pm-skillsIdentify grammar, logical, and flow errors in text and suggest targeted fixes without rewriting the entire text. Use when proofreading content, checking writing quality, or reviewing a draft.Redactare★ 27.3K
- writetw93/WazaRewrites and polishes Chinese or English prose, technical instructions, and product copy. Use when drafting, editing, localizing, or cutting AI tone. Not for code comments or commit messages.Redactare★ 7.4K
- ai-code-reviewmohitagw15856/pm-claude-skillsReview AI-authored code for its characteristic failure modes — plausible-but-wrong logic, hallucinated APIs, over-engineering, dead scaffolding, and silent security shortcuts. Use when reviewing an AI-generated or heavily AI-assisted PR, when AI-written code keeps shipping subtle bugs, or when setting review standards for a team using coding agents. Produces a focused review with AI-specific findings, verification steps per risk class, and a team checklist for AI-authored changes. For general PR review use code-review-checklist — this skill covers what that one assumes a human wouldn't do.Inginerie★ 1.5K
- review-a-designinkeep/open-knowledgeReviews whether a design is SOUND — solving the right problem, derived from its stated goals and constraints — and emits ranked, evidence-backed findings, not edits. Read when asked to 'review this design', 'is this design sound', 'pressure-test this proposal', 'do a design review', 'does this solve the right problem', 'poke holes in this spec', 'should we build this', or to critique a proposal / spec / ADR / architecture or product decision. Do NOT read when the user wants to AUTHOR one of these — routing a new proposal is frame-a-proposal, a spec is write-a-spec, a decision record is record-a-decision, a postmortem is write-a-postmortem. Do NOT read for code review of a diff, or to fact-check individual claims (that is a correctness pass, a different job).Design★ 4.7K
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te