When Does Self-Supervised Learning Transfer to Time-Series Tasks?

arXiv:2605.19462v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Self-supervised learning (SSL) assumes that solving pretext tasks on unlabeled data yields representations that transfer effectively across downstream applications via linear probing or fine-tuning. While this paradigm has driven major progress in vision and language, its benefits for time series remain under-investigated and often confounded by inconsistent experimental controls. To address this gap, we benchmark seven representative methods from five key SSL paradigms across anomaly detection, classification, and forecasting under parameter- and data-matched budgets. We find that transfer efficacy depends heavily on the downstream task. SSL yields substantial gains in anomaly detection and provides effective initializations for classification under fine-tuning, but offers limited to no advantage over non-pre-trained controls in forecasting. Furthermore, linear probing does not reliably predict fine-tuning performance, synthetic pre-training is often competitive with real-world corpora, and scaling encoder depth degrades forecasting accuracy. We synthesize these empirical results into practical evaluation and development guidelines for time-series SSL.

Title:When Does Self-Supervised Learning Transfer to Time-Series Tasks?

Abstract:Self-supervised learning (SSL) assumes that solving pretext tasks on unlabeled data yields representations that transfer effectively across downstream applications via linear probing or fine-tuning. While this paradigm has driven major progress in vision and language, its benefits for time series remain under-investigated and often confounded by inconsistent experimental controls. To address this gap, we benchmark seven representative methods from five key SSL paradigms across anomaly detection, classification, and forecasting under parameter- and data-matched budgets. We find that transfer efficacy depends heavily on the downstream task. SSL yields substantial gains in anomaly detection and provides effective initializations for classification under fine-tuning, but offers limited to no advantage over non-pre-trained controls in forecasting. Furthermore, linear probing does not reliably predict fine-tuning performance, synthetic pre-training is often competitive with real-world corpora, and scaling encoder depth degrades forecasting accuracy. We synthesize these empirical results into practical evaluation and development guidelines for time-series SSL.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2605.19462 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2605.19462v2 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.19462 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

analiza aiqbench

When Does Self-Supervised Learning Transfer to Time-Series Tasks?

Subiecte conexe