analiza aiqbench
This paper introduces CRC, a framework that enhances time series forecasting by selectively deploying post-hoc residual corrections only when validation evidence confirms error reduction. By treating the decision to update as a calibrated deployment rule rather than an always-on process, the method prevents overfitting on noisy signals and stabilizes performance across complex datasets. The approach represents a significant advancement in robust machine learning for sequential data prediction.
Robust Residual Correction via Selective Deployment for Time Series Forecasting
arXiv:2512.22428v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Post-hoc residual correction can reduce forecasting error, but always-on updates often fail to generalize: when residual signals are weak or noisy, expressive correctors can overfit and even increase the overall forecasting errors. We introduce CRC, a robust residual correction framework that couples a hybrid corrector with a validation-calibrated selective deployment rule. CRC proposes corrections via a conservative ridge "floor" plus conditional nonlinear refinement, but deploys them only when held-out evidence indicates net error reduction over a frozen baseline forecaster. CRC treats when to revise a forecast as a validation-calibrated deployment decision, not only how to fit residuals. Across standard long-sequence benchmarks and multiple backbones, CRC improves horizon-averaged MSE and MAE in most dataset-backbone pairs, with particularly large gains on complex datasets (e.g., over 20% relative MSE reduction on Traffic). We additionally report the non-degradation rate (NDR) as a stability diagnostic of harmful updates and ablate the validation-calibrated "firewall" that stabilizes MSE gains.
Abstract:Post-hoc residual correction can reduce forecasting error, but always-on updates often fail to generalize: when residual signals are weak or noisy, expressive correctors can overfit and even increase the overall forecasting errors. We introduce CRC, a robust residual correction framework that couples a hybrid corrector with a validation-calibrated selective deployment rule. CRC proposes corrections via a conservative ridge "floor" plus conditional nonlinear refinement, but deploys them only when held-out evidence indicates net error reduction over a frozen baseline forecaster. CRC treats when to revise a forecast as a validation-calibrated deployment decision, not only how to fit residuals. Across standard long-sequence benchmarks and multiple backbones, CRC improves horizon-averaged MSE and MAE in most dataset-backbone pairs, with particularly large gains on complex datasets (e.g., over 20% relative MSE reduction on Traffic). We additionally report the non-degradation rate (NDR) as a stability diagnostic of harmful updates and ablate the validation-calibrated "firewall" that stabilizes MSE gains.
18 pages. Accepted at NeurIPS 2026. Revised title, experimental analyses, and theoretical discussion
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2512.22428 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2512.22428v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.22428 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 260 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
ECHO: Correcting Time Series Foundation Model Forecasts with Historical Analogues and Errors
arXiv · 14 oct. 2026
EditWM: Event-Decomposed World Modeling with Incremental Correction for End-to-End Autonomous Driving
arXiv · 22 sept. 2026
Quantum-classical hybrid models based on error correction for time series forecasting
arXiv · 16 iun. 2026
Interpretable PM2.5 Forecasting for Urban Air Quality: A Comparative Study of Adaptive Time-Series Models
arXiv · 21 oct. 2026