analiza aiqbench
This paper runs a controlled comparison of encoder-only and decoder-only time-series foundation models, varying patch size, context length, and compute budget across 97 GIFT-Eval forecasting tasks. Encoder-only models generally favor smaller patches, while decoder-only models show a U-shaped pattern with an intermediate patch size performing best on average. For practitioners, the useful takeaway is that the right architecture and patch size depend on the forecast horizon and latency or compute constraints, not on a single universal configuration. The results are benchmark-specific, so they should be validated on your own data before you rely on them.
Investigating the effects of the patch size in Time Series Foundation Models
arXiv:2611.02750v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Patch size is a central design choice in patch-based time-series foundation models, controlling temporal resolution, sequence length, and computational cost. We study how this choice interacts with transformer architecture through a controlled comparison of encoder-only and decoder-only forecasting models trained with the same data mixture and optimization budget. Across 97 GIFT-Eval tasks, encoder-only models consistently benefit from smaller patches, whereas decoder-only performance follows a U-shaped trend, with an intermediate patch size performing best in aggregate. Dataset-level results further show that the preferred decoder patch size increases with the forecasting horizon. For encoder-only models, increasing context length improves performance across patch sizes, although the gains diminish beyond a context length of 2048. Finally, training-compute and CPU-latency Pareto analyses reveal complementary regimes: decoder-only models provide efficient low-cost alternatives, while encoder-only models attain the highest overall accuracy. These results show that the choice of patch size and architecture should be made depending on the forecasting horizon and deployment constraints.
Abstract:Patch size is a central design choice in patch-based time-series foundation models, controlling temporal resolution, sequence length, and computational cost. We study how this choice interacts with transformer architecture through a controlled comparison of encoder-only and decoder-only forecasting models trained with the same data mixture and optimization budget. Across 97 GIFT-Eval tasks, encoder-only models consistently benefit from smaller patches, whereas decoder-only performance follows a U-shaped trend, with an intermediate patch size performing best in aggregate. Dataset-level results further show that the preferred decoder patch size increases with the forecasting horizon. For encoder-only models, increasing context length improves performance across patch sizes, although the gains diminish beyond a context length of 2048. Finally, training-compute and CPU-latency Pareto analyses reveal complementary regimes: decoder-only models provide efficient low-cost alternatives, while encoder-only models attain the highest overall accuracy. These results show that the choice of patch size and architecture should be made depending on the forecasting horizon and deployment constraints.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2611.02750 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2611.02750v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2611.02750 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Text integral sub licența deschisă a publicației · 253 cuvinte
Subiecte conexe
Exploring Exotic Spin-Dependent Interactions Beyond the Standard Model: Theoretical Foundations and Experimental Investigations
arXiv · 12 iun. 2026
Cross-modal learning for SAR target recognition using optical vision foundation models
arXiv · 9 sept. 2026
Cross-Domain Transfer with Particle Physics Foundation Models: From Jets to Neutrino Interactions
arXiv · 27 aug. 2026

Moore Foundation funds research into light-sound quantum tools
Quantum Zeitgeist · 7 oct. 2026