science-org-roles
From the author
Use when deciding who should do a piece of research work, when a task has no owner or two owners, when a role's authority is unclear (who may approve a design, who may veto an analysis), or when a disagreement must be escalated; covers the 13-role RACI table across S0–S11, the six authority types, the veto bypass to the PI, and the escalation path from shard worker to PI.
Install
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-org-roles -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/science-org-roles/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 87
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- scientific-problem-selectionanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsThis skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".OfficialScience★ 34.8K
- sci-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which sci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for Science (AAAS). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Productivity★ 1.4K
- scientific-writergaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has a scientific draft (with its dataset, figures, and optional analysis code) and wants it iteratively revised until it clears a quality bar. Five specialist judges (figures, scientific content, style, formatting, code) critique the draft; a fresh, independent peer_reviewer grades it on those same axes (1-5 each → a percentage) with honesty guardrails; a scientific_writer revises prose, figures, and code — regenerating figures by running the user's plot command — until the peer-review score clears the threshold or the budget is hit. Not for writing a paper from a blank page, and not for a standalone literature survey.Science★ 180
- science-consensus-reportyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when several agents or votes produced different answers and the result must be merged into one defensible statement — when running the three-vote rule, when weighting preprints against peer-reviewed evidence, when escalating an unresolved disagreement, or when writing the evidence table and gap list that a campaign report must carry.Science★ 845
- scientific-figuregaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has scientific data (or a prompt alluding to scientific data) and wants a publication-quality figure made from it. A generator drafts and renders a figure that lands a frozen communication goal; an adversarial critic critiques it hard and grades it 1-5 per axis against a fixed rubric (message, aesthetic, clarity, integrity, and a conditional domain-completeness axis), aggregates to 0-100, and decides pass; the generator revises against the critic's findings until the grade clears a threshold or the budget is hit. Both roles may consult the literature (Semantic Scholar + arXiv) to verify domain content (e.g. a pathway figure's gene set, or a benchmark's reported numbers), and conform to / grade against a named journal's figure spec fetched via web search. Not for writing a paper or analyzing a dataset, and not for editing an existing finished image — this renders a figure from data/brief and iterates on it.Science★ 180
- researchOyadotAI/oya-browserThis skill should be used when researching a technical question, checking current API facts, comparing documented capabilities, or gathering primary-source evidence for a decision.Science★ 348
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in