science-org-roles
De la autor
Use when deciding who should do a piece of research work, when a task has no owner or two owners, when a role's authority is unclear (who may approve a design, who may veto an analysis), or when a disagreement must be escalated; covers the 13-role RACI table across S0–S11, the six authority types, the veto bypass to the PI, and the escalation path from shard worker to PI.
Instalare
npx skills add yzlin286-wq/Deepscient --skill science-org-roles -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/science-org-roles/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 87
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- scientific-problem-selectionanthropics/knowledge-work-pluginsThis skill should be used when scientists need help with research problem selection, project ideation, troubleshooting stuck projects, or strategic scientific decisions. Use this skill when users ask to pitch a new research idea, work through a project problem, evaluate project risks, plan research strategy, navigate decision trees, or get help choosing what scientific problem to work on. Typical requests include "I have an idea for a project", "I'm stuck on my research", "help me evaluate this project", "what should I work on", or "I need strategic advice about my research".OficialȘtiință★ 34.8K
- sci-workflowbrycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-SkillsUse when deciding which sci-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing a manuscript from significance test through reviewer rebuttal for Science (AAAS). Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.Productivitate★ 1.4K
- scientific-writergaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has a scientific draft (with its dataset, figures, and optional analysis code) and wants it iteratively revised until it clears a quality bar. Five specialist judges (figures, scientific content, style, formatting, code) critique the draft; a fresh, independent peer_reviewer grades it on those same axes (1-5 each → a percentage) with honesty guardrails; a scientific_writer revises prose, figures, and code — regenerating figures by running the user's plot command — until the peer-review score clears the threshold or the budget is hit. Not for writing a paper from a blank page, and not for a standalone literature survey.Știință★ 180
- science-consensus-reportyzlin286-wq/DeepscientUse when several agents or votes produced different answers and the result must be merged into one defensible statement — when running the three-vote rule, when weighting preprints against peer-reviewed evidence, when escalating an unresolved disagreement, or when writing the evidence table and gap list that a campaign report must carry.Știință★ 845
- scientific-figuregaasher/Agent-Loop-SkillsUse when the user has scientific data (or a prompt alluding to scientific data) and wants a publication-quality figure made from it. A generator drafts and renders a figure that lands a frozen communication goal; an adversarial critic critiques it hard and grades it 1-5 per axis against a fixed rubric (message, aesthetic, clarity, integrity, and a conditional domain-completeness axis), aggregates to 0-100, and decides pass; the generator revises against the critic's findings until the grade clears a threshold or the budget is hit. Both roles may consult the literature (Semantic Scholar + arXiv) to verify domain content (e.g. a pathway figure's gene set, or a benchmark's reported numbers), and conform to / grade against a named journal's figure spec fetched via web search. Not for writing a paper or analyzing a dataset, and not for editing an existing finished image — this renders a figure from data/brief and iterates on it.Știință★ 180
- researchOyadotAI/oya-browserThis skill should be used when researching a technical question, checking current API facts, comparing documented capabilities, or gathering primary-source evidence for a decision.Știință★ 348
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te