review-others-manuscripts
From the author
Use when acting as an invited referee on someone else's submission, including writing a referee report, drafting reviewer comments, assessing a revision round against the authors' response letter, running an editorial prescreen for scope and policy, or judging whether a stated claim is carried by the evidence in a manuscript under review. Use for a manuscript that is not yours and is confidential; rehearsing objections against your own unsubmitted paper is a different task.
Install
npx skills add gxCaesar/open-research-skills --skill review-others-manuscripts -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/review-others-manuscripts/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
- Ships scripts we have not reviewedLow
Why 74
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- run-cold-review-panelgxCaesar/open-research-skillsUse when a manuscript you wrote is nearly finished and needs a hostile read before it is submitted, including a mock review, a simulated reviewer panel, a pre-submission review, red-team the paper, asking whether this would get rejected, or checking which reviewer objection the paper cannot survive. Use for your own unsubmitted manuscript; reviewing someone else's submission as an invited referee is a different task.Engineering★ 58
- reviewhashgraph-online/awesome-codex-pluginsGive advisory feedback on a plan, design or code change. Use when: asked for an opinion or a look-over, even informally. Not for acceptance; use Validate.Engineering★ 1.4K
- self-reviewAperivue/medsci-skillsUse when checking your own manuscript before submission from a reviewer's perspective. Returns anticipated Major/Minor comments with fixes, including numerical, citation and leakage checks, with an optional multi-reviewer panel. Someone else's paper is /peer-review.Engineering★ 349
- journal-reviewscdenney/open-science-skillsDraft a referee report on someone else's manuscript for a journal editor, using five adversarial finders, a Blue Team error filter, a Chief Reviewer synthesis, and a Tone Guard legal pass. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript; self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, author responses to referee-response.Engineering★ 69
- prepare-journal-manuscriptsgxCaesar/open-research-skillsUse when preparing, drafting, revising, polishing, auditing, or packaging a journal manuscript, abstract, statistical or evaluation report, cover letter, editor-facing submission pack, data availability statement, peer-review response, revise and resubmit package, clean manuscript, marked manuscript, or final accepted-paper files. Also use for single-section or section-by-section polish and resuming the next section. Includes manuscript-context figures and journal-package checks without requiring another skill; disputed experiment evidence must be resolved before changing manuscript prose.Science★ 58
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in