agent-architecture-analysis
From the author
Use when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.
Install
npx skills add existential-birds/beagle --skill agent-architecture-analysis -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/agent-architecture-analysis/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 80
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- design-architectureSenolIsci/mykgReviews the current codebase architecture and proposes improvements using four parallel specialist subagents: System Architect, Software Architect, Data Architect, and an Adversarial Architect that red-teams failure paths, LLM adversarial output scenarios, silent corruption risks, and invariant bypasses. Each subagent independently analyzes the codebase from their domain perspective, then their findings are consolidated into a living `architecture.md` file with a tracked to-do list and change log. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or improve the architecture — or when they ask questions like "what should we change structurally?", "how is the system organized?", "what are our architecture problems?", "can you do an architecture review?", or "let's redesign X". Also trigger when the user mentions technical debt, structural improvements, security concerns, failure modes, vulnerabilities, or wants a second opinion on design decisions, even if they don't use the word "architecture".Design★ 79
- agentic-architectureOvid/paadUse when assessing the architectural health of a codebase — before a major refactor, when onboarding to an unfamiliar repo, after rapid growth, when planning a redesign, or to surface structural strengths and risks before they become expensive. Not for fixing what it finds, and not for reviewing a branch diff.Planning★ 142
- agent-architecturegithub/awesome-copilotDesign AI agent architectures through requirements discovery, or audit and diagnose architectural flaws in existing agents. Architecture only; excludes implementation and general code review.Planning★ 40.4K
- architectural-analysistestdouble/hanPerforms deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.Planning★ 322
- hk-arch-auditdeepklarity/harness-kitRun comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles. Audits a codebase against 8 agent-native architecture principles (Action Parity, Tools as Primitives, Context Injection, Shared Workspace, CRUD Completeness, UI Integration, Capability Discovery, Prompt-Native Features) by launching parallel sub-agents and producing a scored report. Use when the user wants to evaluate how agent-friendly their architecture is, or audit specific principles. Triggers on: 'agent native audit', 'architecture review', 'how agent-friendly is this', or /hk-arch-audit.Design★ 102
- agentic-reviewOvid/paadUse when reviewing current branch for bugs before pushing or merging, when wanting a thorough multi-agent review of local changes, or when preparing work for human review. Not for codebase structure, not for code style, and not for fixing what it finds.Engineering★ 142
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in