hk-arch-audit
From the author
Run comprehensive agent-native architecture review with scored principles. Audits a codebase against 8 agent-native architecture principles (Action Parity, Tools as Primitives, Context Injection, Shared Workspace, CRUD Completeness, UI Integration, Capability Discovery, Prompt-Native Features) by launching parallel sub-agents and producing a scored report. Use when the user wants to evaluate how agent-friendly their architecture is, or audit specific principles. Triggers on: 'agent native audit', 'architecture review', 'how agent-friendly is this', or /hk-arch-audit.
Install
npx skills add deepklarity/harness-kit --skill hk-arch-audit -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/hk-arch-audit/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 79
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- design-architectureSenolIsci/mykgReviews the current codebase architecture and proposes improvements using four parallel specialist subagents: System Architect, Software Architect, Data Architect, and an Adversarial Architect that red-teams failure paths, LLM adversarial output scenarios, silent corruption risks, and invariant bypasses. Each subagent independently analyzes the codebase from their domain perspective, then their findings are consolidated into a living `architecture.md` file with a tracked to-do list and change log. Use this skill whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or improve the architecture — or when they ask questions like "what should we change structurally?", "how is the system organized?", "what are our architecture problems?", "can you do an architecture review?", or "let's redesign X". Also trigger when the user mentions technical debt, structural improvements, security concerns, failure modes, vulnerabilities, or wants a second opinion on design decisions, even if they don't use the word "architecture".Design★ 79
- agent-architecture-analysisexistential-birds/beagleUse when auditing an agent codebase against the 12-Factor Agents methodology, reviewing LLM-powered system architecture, or assessing agentic app compliance. Triggers on "analyze agent architecture", "12-factor audit", "how compliant is this agent", or "evaluate this LLM app". Also applies when comparing frameworks or planning agent improvements. Not for quick checklists — this performs deep per-factor codebase analysis with file-level evidence.Planning★ 84
- agent-architecturegithub/awesome-copilotDesign AI agent architectures through requirements discovery, or audit and diagnose architectural flaws in existing agents. Architecture only; excludes implementation and general code review.Planning★ 40.4K
- hk-autonomy-auditdeepklarity/harness-kitAudit whether an AI agent can autonomously close the loop on problems in a given area — from discovering a symptom to verifying a fix — without human intervention. Evaluates documentation, diagnostic tools, commands, logs, and flows for completeness and actionability. Generates a gap-focused report with ratings. Use this skill whenever someone wants to assess debugging readiness, check if docs are agent-sufficient, audit a workflow for autonomous solvability, evaluate operational tooling coverage, or wants to know 'could an agent fix this on its own?' Triggers on: 'loop audit', 'audit this flow', 'is this debuggable', 'agent readiness', 'can an agent solve this', 'autonomous debugging check', or /hk-autonomy-audit.Engineering★ 102
- brooks-audithyhmrright/brooks-lintArchitecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.Planning★ 1.5K
- agent-evaluationthiientv/godmodeDesigns and runs reproducible evaluations for AI agents, prompts, tools, skills, and model-backed workflows using realistic datasets, isolated baselines, objective assertions, rubric grading, trajectory analysis, cost/latency tracking, and regression comparison. Use when measuring agent quality, optimizing skill triggering, comparing prompts or models, or gating an AI feature release. Not for ordinary deterministic unit tests.Testing★ 99
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in