debate-practice-coach
From the author
Interactive debate and argument practice with structured feedback, counterargument generation, logical fallacy identification, and scoring rubrics. Use when preparing for debates, improving persuasion skills, or practicing argumentation.
Install
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill debate-practice-coach -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/debate-practice-coach/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Download .zip
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
Security100
Provenance64
Maintenance100
Licence100
Adoption35
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- case-interview-practicetravisjneuman/.claudeInteractive consulting case interview practice with structured frameworks, feedback mechanisms, and progressive difficulty. Use when preparing for management consulting interviews, case competitions, or business problem-solving exercises.Planning★ 106
- critical-argumentationTibsfox/gsd-skill-creatorPractical argument analysis and construction -- how to identify, evaluate, reconstruct, and build real arguments in natural language. Covers argument identification (premises, conclusions, intermediate steps), charity and steel-manning, argument mapping, the distinction between deductive validity and inductive strength, burden of proof, and the rhetorical context in which arguments operate. Use when the goal is to engage with real-world argument rather than to formalize it.Productivity★ 71
- job-interview-coachingmagnus919/agent-skillsUse this skill to coach candidates and interviewers for job interviews: prepare truthful examples, critique interview transcripts, run interactive mock interviews and targeted practice, design structured questions and evidence-based scorecards, and improve candidate experience. Adapt to profession, seniority, and interview format. Do not use for journalism, user research, workflow discovery, general resume writing, clinical interviewing, or autonomous hiring decisions.Planning★ 148
- discussavibebuilder/claude-primeBrainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.Planning★ 120
- life-coachmagnus919/agent-skillsGuide a bounded, user-led coaching process for personal goals, decisions, transitions, habits, recurring nonclinical patterns, accountability, and progress review. Use when a person explicitly asks to be coached, wants reflective challenge, or wants help examining ambivalence while retaining ownership. Do not use for therapy, crisis support, diagnosis, direct factual or action requests, product or stakeholder discovery, or medical, legal, financial, addiction, domestic-violence, or other specialist advice.Science★ 148
- rhetorical-analystinfranodus/skillsAnalyze arguments, debate tactics, and rhetorical moves across three dimensions: persuasion, rhetoric, and logic. Use when the user wants to analyze a debate, comment thread, speech, article, or any argumentative text — identifying moves, scoring effectiveness, exposing hidden assumptions, tracking logical gaps, and checking for asymmetric standards. When InfraNodus MCP tools are available, ALWAYS begin with generate_topical_clusters, generate_content_gaps, and optimize_text_structure before linear reading. Also use to stress-test arguments or understand why something feels persuasive but wrong. Trigger on: "analyze this argument", "what's wrong with this reasoning", "is this a good point", "what rhetorical moves are being used", "why is this persuasive", "break down this debate", or when a user shares text asking what's going on rhetorically.Testing★ 122
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in