debate-practice-coach
De la autor
Interactive debate and argument practice with structured feedback, counterargument generation, logical fallacy identification, and scoring rubrics. Use when preparing for debates, improving persuasion skills, or practicing argumentation.
Instalare
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill debate-practice-coach -a claude-code
Se instalează în .claude/skills/debate-practice-coach/ · Fiecare comandă descarcă skill-ul direct de pe GitHub cu utilitarul open source skills.
Descarcă .zip
Identic octet cu octet cu commit-ul scanat, cu licența depozitului și un fișier SOURCE.txt.
Vrei ca agentul să-ți propună skill-uri în timp ce scrii? Vezi cum folosești skill-urile din IDE.
Verificări de siguranță pe SKILL.md
Niciun avertisment.
De ce 83
Securitate100
Proveniență64
Întreținere100
Licență100
Adopție35
aiqbench calculează scorul de încredere din semnale publice. Nu este un audit de securitate, așa că citește un skill înainte să-l instalezi.
Skill-uri similare
Cele mai apropiate de acesta prin ce fac și când sunt folosite.
- case-interview-practicetravisjneuman/.claudeInteractive consulting case interview practice with structured frameworks, feedback mechanisms, and progressive difficulty. Use when preparing for management consulting interviews, case competitions, or business problem-solving exercises.Planificare★ 106
- critical-argumentationTibsfox/gsd-skill-creatorPractical argument analysis and construction -- how to identify, evaluate, reconstruct, and build real arguments in natural language. Covers argument identification (premises, conclusions, intermediate steps), charity and steel-manning, argument mapping, the distinction between deductive validity and inductive strength, burden of proof, and the rhetorical context in which arguments operate. Use when the goal is to engage with real-world argument rather than to formalize it.Productivitate★ 71
- job-interview-coachingmagnus919/agent-skillsUse this skill to coach candidates and interviewers for job interviews: prepare truthful examples, critique interview transcripts, run interactive mock interviews and targeted practice, design structured questions and evidence-based scorecards, and improve candidate experience. Adapt to profession, seniority, and interview format. Do not use for journalism, user research, workflow discovery, general resume writing, clinical interviewing, or autonomous hiring decisions.Planificare★ 148
- discussavibebuilder/claude-primeBrainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.Planificare★ 120
- life-coachmagnus919/agent-skillsGuide a bounded, user-led coaching process for personal goals, decisions, transitions, habits, recurring nonclinical patterns, accountability, and progress review. Use when a person explicitly asks to be coached, wants reflective challenge, or wants help examining ambivalence while retaining ownership. Do not use for therapy, crisis support, diagnosis, direct factual or action requests, product or stakeholder discovery, or medical, legal, financial, addiction, domestic-violence, or other specialist advice.Știință★ 148
- rhetorical-analystinfranodus/skillsAnalyze arguments, debate tactics, and rhetorical moves across three dimensions: persuasion, rhetoric, and logic. Use when the user wants to analyze a debate, comment thread, speech, article, or any argumentative text — identifying moves, scoring effectiveness, exposing hidden assumptions, tracking logical gaps, and checking for asymmetric standards. When InfraNodus MCP tools are available, ALWAYS begin with generate_topical_clusters, generate_content_gaps, and optimize_text_structure before linear reading. Also use to stress-test arguments or understand why something feels persuasive but wrong. Trigger on: "analyze this argument", "what's wrong with this reasoning", "is this a good point", "what rhetorical moves are being used", "why is this persuasive", "break down this debate", or when a user shares text asking what's going on rhetorically.Testare★ 122
Note și recenzii
—
nicio recenzie
Ai încercat acest skill? Notează-l ca să-i ajuți pe alții. Autentifică-te
Discuție
Intră în discuție. Autentifică-te