product-lifecycle-learning
From the author
Compare intended product outcomes against observed results to close the launch-to-learning loop: collect post-launch evidence, distinguish expected from observed from uncertain from inferred claims, update assumptions, assess feature health, and choose among continue/improve/harvest/pivot/pause/retire — including retirement lifecycles with deprecation, migration, customer treatment, and retained reusable learning. Do not use for incident postmortems or root-cause analysis (routes to incident-learning or site-reliability-engineering); do not use for analytics instrumentation or metric dashboard design (routes to product-analytics-and-measurement); do not use arbitrary thresholds as universal retirement rules — decisions require human judgment and context.
Install
npx skills add magnus919/agent-skills --skill product-lifecycle-learning -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/product-lifecycle-learning/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 84
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- product-lifecyclemagnus919/agent-skillsRoute a product through its full lifecycle — discovery, strategy, portfolio choice, roadmap, UX and requirements, experimentation, delivery handoff, adoption, success, and lifecycle review — by composing existing specialist product skills with phase-entry evidence, handoff artifacts, and escalation rules. Use when evaluating a new product idea, managing a product through its lifecycle, or connecting product phases that currently operate in isolation. Do not use for a single product task that is already owned by a specialist skill (load that skill directly); do not use for software delivery lifecycle work (route to neckbeard); do not use to duplicate product discovery, strategy, UX, experimentation, analytics, release, or delivery methods.Data★ 147
- incident-learningmagnus919/agent-skillsConvert operational incident and near-miss evidence into durable product, engineering, test, evaluation, and governance improvements with verified closure. Separate observed facts from causal hypotheses and unresolved uncertainty; map follow-up work across code, tests, skills, operations, product, and governance; track ownership, verification, and closure for every finding. Do not use to assign blame or produce a generic postmortem template; do not close learning because tickets were created — require evidence the intended change occurred.Testing★ 147
- feedbacksuboss87/FDEOpsAssess a field lesson for reuse or product feedback without exposing customer context. Use for recurring deployment lessons; distinguish a hypothesis from a validated pattern.DevOps★ 941
- product-lifecycle-playsdeanpeters/Product-Manager-SkillsMap a product's lifecycle stage and choose between extension, replacement, and retirement plays. Use when a product is maturing or declining and the next move isn't obvious.Other★ 7.6K
- launch-retrospectiveOotto-AI/claude-content-skillsUse after a social launch, campaign, creator collaboration, or distribution test has enough evidence to decide what should be repeated, changed, or stopped. Trigger phrases include "run a launch retro", "what did we learn from this campaign?", "postmortem this launch", "should we repeat this?", and "turn these results into next steps". Do not use this to assign blame, invent missing data, or write a live performance dashboard; use social-analytics-report for the in-flight metric read and campaign-brief to plan the next campaign.Testing★ 272
- product-experimentationmagnus919/agent-skillsRun end-to-end product experiments from assumption to decision: translate assumptions into testable hypotheses and experiment briefs, select the right method among qualitative interviews, prototypes, concierge tests, fake doors, feature flags, and A/B tests, and produce readouts that update the roadmap and decision record. Do not use when a qualitative or prototype test is the clearly right answer without statistical measurement; do not prescribe A/B testing by default; do not treat statistical significance as the only decision criterion or hide ethical and guardrail considerations.Testing★ 147
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in