literature-review
From the author
Conduct a structured literature review on a given topic by defining a search strategy, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracting key findings, and synthesizing results into a coherent academic review. Use when the user requests literature review or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
Install
npx skills add seb1n/awesome-ai-agent-skills --skill literature-review -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/literature-review/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 82
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- lit-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowStructured literature search + synthesis with citation extraction, thematic clustering, and gap identification. Use when user says "find papers on X", "do a lit review", "what's the literature on...", "summarize what we know about...", "where's the gap in this field", "review recent work on Y". Produces a written review with BibTeX-ready citations. Uses WebSearch/WebFetch for recent work.Engineering★ 1.7K
- literature-review-plannertravisjneuman/.claudeStructured literature review planning with systematic methodology, source evaluation, and synthesis frameworks. Use when planning academic literature reviews, research surveys, systematic reviews, or scoping reviews.Planning★ 106
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- reviewyha9806/academic-writing-toolkitReview a manuscript or chapter as an external reviewer, or run an own-work self-review in a fresh-context clean room, producing anchored findings and a recommendation.Engineering★ 50
- code-reviewgetsentry/skillsPerform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.OfficialEngineering★ 1.1K
- structured-outputathola/claude-night-marketFormats review deliverables with consistent structure for comparable findings. Use when finalizing any review or analysis that must be shared or compared.Engineering★ 343
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in