literature-review-planner
From the author
Structured literature review planning with systematic methodology, source evaluation, and synthesis frameworks. Use when planning academic literature reviews, research surveys, systematic reviews, or scoping reviews.
Install
npx skills add travisjneuman/.claude --skill literature-review-planner -a claude-code
Installs to .claude/skills/literature-review-planner/ · Each command fetches the skill straight from GitHub with the open skills CLI.
Byte-identical to the scanned commit, with the repository’s licence and a SOURCE.txt.
Want your agent to suggest skills while you type? See how to use skills from your IDE.
Safety checks on SKILL.md
No warnings.
Why 83
aiqbench computes the trust score from public signals. It is not a security audit, so read a skill before you install it.
Similar skills
Closest to this one by what they do and when they are used.
- literature-reviewK-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skillsConducts systematic, scoping, and narrative literature reviews using PubMed, arXiv, bioRxiv, Semantic Scholar, and other appropriate sources. Use for research synthesis, reproducible literature searches, screening, citation checking, or preparing Markdown and PDF reviews. Tracks search coverage, records versus studies, and evidence limitations; supports meta-analysis planning but does not supply a meta-analysis engine.Engineering★ 54.4K
- lit-reviewpedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowStructured literature search + synthesis with citation extraction, thematic clustering, and gap identification. Use when user says "find papers on X", "do a lit review", "what's the literature on...", "summarize what we know about...", "where's the gap in this field", "review recent work on Y". Produces a written review with BibTeX-ready citations. Uses WebSearch/WebFetch for recent work.Engineering★ 1.7K
- peer-reviewforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsStructured manuscript/grant review with checklist-based evaluation. Use when writing formal peer reviews with specific criteria methodology assessment, statistical validity, reporting standards compliance (CONSORT/STROBE), and constructive feedback. Best for actual review writing, manuscript revision. For evaluating claims/evidence quality use scientific-critical-thinking; for quantitative scoring frameworks use scholar-evaluation.Engineering★ 3.8K
- review-plantobihagemann/turboReview a plan by running internal reviews and a peer review in parallel and returning combined findings. Use when the user asks to "review my plan", "check my plan", "critique my plan", or wants feedback on a plan.Planning★ 416
- scholarly-publishingforyourhealth111-pixel/Vibe-SkillsUse when planning an end-to-end scholarly publishing workflow, including manuscript source-of-truth, submission assets, revision/rebuttal files, camera-ready checks, reproducible build expectations, and publication package structure.Planning★ 3.8K
- write-planbrycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-SkillsUse when a research design spec exists and the user is ready to translate it into a concrete implementation plan with phased tasks, artifacts, and verification criteria. Produces a research execution plan organized in canonical research phases — collection, preparation, analysis, robustness, writing, submission.Writing★ 4.8K
Ratings & reviews
—
no reviews
Tried this skill? Rate it to help others. Sign in
Discussion
Join the discussion. Sign in