Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces MissionBench, a rigorous benchmark evaluating how well general-purpose Multimodal Large Language Models perform on complex aerial navigation tasks without specific fine-tuning. Results reveal that even the strongest current models succeed in fewer than 35% of missions compared to human performance, underscoring significant gaps in multi-step planning and adaptive reasoning for embodied AI. The study highlights both the potential benefits of scaling model parameters and the inherent risks associated with relying solely on general-purpose architectures for specialized robotic applications.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Zero-Shot Mission-Level Evaluation for Aerial MLLM Agents

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2607.22014v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are emerging as core reasoning modules for embodied agents, yet it remains unclear how well general-purpose models can solve long-horizon embodied tasks from a single high-level instruction. We introduce MissionBench, a benchmark for mission-level evaluation of MLLMs in aerial 3D environments. It comprises 120 missions across five simulated 3D environments and four task families. Agents must autonomously plan, navigate, and report outcomes using only egocentric observations and its action history, without aerial-specific fine-tuning. Across 22 open- and closed-source MLLMs, the strongest model succeeds on fewer than 35% of missions compared to 84.4% human performance, highlighting the difficulty of multi-step embodied tasks. Despite large variations between model families, we observe gains from scaling, indicating that larger general-purpose models possess stronger zero-shot embodied capabilities. Our analysis shows that mission-level competence requires coordinating multiple capabilities beyond spatial perception, including multi-step planning and adaptive reasoning. This motivates closed-loop evaluation and highlights both the promise and risk of scaling-driven improvements for embodied AI.

Abstract:Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are emerging as core reasoning modules for embodied agents, yet it remains unclear how well general-purpose models can solve long-horizon embodied tasks from a single high-level instruction. We introduce MissionBench, a benchmark for mission-level evaluation of MLLMs in aerial 3D environments. It comprises 120 missions across five simulated 3D environments and four task families. Agents must autonomously plan, navigate, and report outcomes using only egocentric observations and its action history, without aerial-specific fine-tuning. Across 22 open- and closed-source MLLMs, the strongest model succeeds on fewer than 35% of missions compared to 84.4% human performance, highlighting the difficulty of multi-step embodied tasks. Despite large variations between model families, we observe gains from scaling, indicating that larger general-purpose models possess stronger zero-shot embodied capabilities. Our analysis shows that mission-level competence requires coordinating multiple capabilities beyond spatial perception, including multi-step planning and adaptive reasoning. This motivates closed-loop evaluation and highlights both the promise and risk of scaling-driven improvements for embodied AI.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Robotics (cs.RO)

arXiv:2607.22014 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2607.22014v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.22014 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 269 words

Related coverage