Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces directional Fréchet distance to decompose the scalar metrics FID and FVD into interpretable semantic components, addressing the opacity of current generative model evaluations. By projecting optimal transport displacements onto specific directions, the authors reveal how factors like sampling steps or per-frame appearance biases drive performance gaps in image, video, and protein generation tasks. The open-sourced codebase provides a practical tool for researchers to diagnose distribution discrepancies beyond simple scalar scores.
Sources coveringarXiv, Quantum Zeitgeist, LessWrong
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

What Does Fr\'echet Distance Measure? A Directional Decomposition

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.05518v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: The Fr\'echet distance is a de facto standard for evaluating generative models across domains, appearing as FID for images and FVD for videos. It summarizes the discrepancy between generated and reference distributions in a single scalar, with lower values typically interpreted as better generation quality. However, this scalar view can obscure what drives the comparison. For example, in COCO dataset, increasing the number of diffusion sampling steps improves ImageReward scores yet worsens (increases) FID. Motivated by this mismatch, we seek to make the Fr\'echet distance more interpretable by uncovering where the discrepancy lies. To this end, we introduce directional Fr\'echet distance, the expected squared projection of the optimal transport displacement onto a given direction. Across our image, video, and protein case studies, we find that a small number of interpretable directions account for much of the distance. We use these directions to explain the FID increase in terms of semantic concepts represented by CLIP embeddings, quantify FVD's bias toward per-frame appearance, and revisit the interpretation of Protein FID. We open-source our codebase at https://github.com/yhlee-add/directional-fd.

Title:What Does Fréchet Distance Measure? A Directional Decomposition

Abstract:The Fréchet distance is a de facto standard for evaluating generative models across domains, appearing as FID for images and FVD for videos. It summarizes the discrepancy between generated and reference distributions in a single scalar, with lower values typically interpreted as better generation quality. However, this scalar view can obscure what drives the comparison. For example, in COCO dataset, increasing the number of diffusion sampling steps improves ImageReward scores yet worsens (increases) FID. Motivated by this mismatch, we seek to make the Fréchet distance more interpretable by uncovering where the discrepancy lies. To this end, we introduce directional Fréchet distance, the expected squared projection of the optimal transport displacement onto a given direction. Across our image, video, and protein case studies, we find that a small number of interpretable directions account for much of the distance. We use these directions to explain the FID increase in terms of semantic concepts represented by CLIP embeddings, quantify FVD's bias toward per-frame appearance, and revisit the interpretation of Protein FID. We open-source our codebase at this https URL.

Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)

arXiv:2610.05518 [cs.AI]

(or arXiv:2610.05518v1 [cs.AI] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.05518 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 278 words

Related coverage