aiqbench analysis
This research introduces a novel framework using perceptual adjustment queries (PAQs) to calibrate facial affect recognition tasks at the individual level, addressing systematic violations in assumed perceptual difficulty. By estimating each participant's Just Noticeable Difference (JND), the method successfully equalizes task difficulty and reduces response time variance compared to population-level baselines. This advancement represents a significant step toward more robust and personalized machine learning models for human affect perception.
Toward individual-level calibration in affect recognition with perceptual adjustment queries
arXiv:2609.21073v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Behavioral tasks measuring facial affect perception assume that identical stimuli impose equivalent perceptual difficulty across participants. However, this assumption is systematically violated by individual differences in perceptual sensitivity. Using an affective perception task as our testbed, we propose a framework to normalize for perceptual difficulty that directly estimates each participant's Just Noticeable Difference (JND) along the facial affect spectrum via cognitively lightweight perceptual adjustment queries (PAQs). We use these PAQ-inferred JNDs to re-express stimulus distances, constructing difficulty-equated tasks in perceptual space. We validate the framework in a Two-Alternative Forced-Choice (2AFC) task using two complementary behavioral measures: binary metacognitive difficulty judgments and response time variance decomposition. We find that PAQ calibration significantly equalizes perceived task difficulty at an individual level when compared to both the non-calibrated baseline and population-level Weibull calibration, while also reducing mean response time and between-subject variance in response time. These results establish PAQ as a principled and practical instrument for individualized perceptual calibration in facial affect recognition.
Abstract:Behavioral tasks measuring facial affect perception assume that identical stimuli impose equivalent perceptual difficulty across participants. However, this assumption is systematically violated by individual differences in perceptual sensitivity. Using an affective perception task as our testbed, we propose a framework to normalize for perceptual difficulty that directly estimates each participant's Just Noticeable Difference (JND) along the facial affect spectrum via cognitively lightweight perceptual adjustment queries (PAQs). We use these PAQ-inferred JNDs to re-express stimulus distances, constructing difficulty-equated tasks in perceptual space. We validate the framework in a Two-Alternative Forced-Choice (2AFC) task using two complementary behavioral measures: binary metacognitive difficulty judgments and response time variance decomposition. We find that PAQ calibration significantly equalizes perceived task difficulty at an individual level when compared to both the non-calibrated baseline and population-level Weibull calibration, while also reducing mean response time and between-subject variance in response time. These results establish PAQ as a principled and practical instrument for individualized perceptual calibration in facial affect recognition.
14 pages, 13 figures. Accepted as a poster at IEEE ACII 2026
Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2609.21073 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.21073v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.21073 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 266 words
Related coverage

Game Design Creativity evals
LessWrong · Oct 12, 2026
The Continual Constitutional Convention: How language models revise the documents that govern them
AI Alignment Forum · Oct 13, 2026

AI in healthcare: applications and best practices
Databricks · Jul 24, 2026
State of the Field: AI for Epistemics and Coordination
LessWrong · Oct 2, 2026