aiqbench analysis
This research investigates the hidden failure modes of medical vision-language models when faced with distribution shifts, revealing that apparent reliability often masks underlying issues like source-proxy leakage and poor multimodal alignment. The study demonstrates that self-supervised initialization offers more robust cross-dataset transfer than supervised pretraining, while adversarial adaptation proves unstable under increased pressure. These findings underscore the critical need for stress-tested evaluation protocols to ensure epistemic intelligence in clinical AI deployments before they can be trusted outside narrow domains.
What Do Medical Vision-Language Models Learn in Radiology? Transfer, Alignment, and Source-Proxy Leakage Under Distribution Shift
arXiv:2608.25251v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Medical vision-language models (VLMs) can appear reliable in-domain while failing when acquisition domain, paired supervision, or evaluation protocol changes. We study this failure mode as a representation-level blind spot relevant to epistemic intelligence, without claiming a formal estimator of epistemic uncertainty. Using NIH ChestXray14 and CheXpert, we first isolate source-only cross-dataset visual transfer from unsupervised domain-adaptation diagnostics. Using PadChest and OpenI, we then evaluate multimodal alignment under strict pair-index retrieval and quantify metadata-derived source-proxy information retained in frozen embeddings. Self-supervised visual initialization improves NIH-to-CheXpert transfer over supervised ImageNet initialization in matched ResNet-18 comparisons, whereas adversarial adaptation is useful only in a narrow regime and becomes unstable as adversarial pressure increases. Multimodal exact-pair retrieval remains low under external OpenI stress testing, and source-proxy information remains recoverable from learned representations. Qualitative nearest-neighbor and Grad-CAM analyses show clinically plausible cross-dataset structure and thoracic attention patterns in many cases, while device-heavy and false-positive cases remain ambiguous. Auxiliary architecture checks are task-dependent and do not support a universal backbone ranking. Overall, the study shows that apparent competence under a single protocol can conceal transfer, alignment, and shortcut-related failure modes, motivating stress-tested evaluation of medical VLMs under distribution shift.
Title:What Do Medical Vision-Language Models Learn in Radiology? Transfer, Alignment, and Source-Proxy Leakage Under Distribution Shift
Abstract:Medical vision-language models (VLMs) can appear reliable in-domain while failing when acquisition domain, paired supervision, or evaluation protocol changes. We study this failure mode as a representation-level blind spot relevant to epistemic intelligence, without claiming a formal estimator of epistemic uncertainty. Using NIH ChestXray14 and CheXpert, we first isolate source-only cross-dataset visual transfer from unsupervised domain-adaptation diagnostics. Using PadChest and OpenI, we then evaluate multimodal alignment under strict pair-index retrieval and quantify metadata-derived source-proxy information retained in frozen embeddings. Self-supervised visual initialization improves NIH-to-CheXpert transfer over supervised ImageNet initialization in matched ResNet-18 comparisons, whereas adversarial adaptation is useful only in a narrow regime and becomes unstable as adversarial pressure increases. Multimodal exact-pair retrieval remains low under external OpenI stress testing, and source-proxy information remains recoverable from learned representations. Qualitative nearest-neighbor and Grad-CAM analyses show clinically plausible cross-dataset structure and thoracic attention patterns in many cases, while device-heavy and false-positive cases remain ambiguous. Auxiliary architecture checks are task-dependent and do not support a universal backbone ranking. Overall, the study shows that apparent competence under a single protocol can conceal transfer, alignment, and shortcut-related failure modes, motivating stress-tested evaluation of medical VLMs under distribution shift.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2608.25251 [cs.CV]
(or arXiv:2608.25251v1 [cs.CV] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25251 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 307 words
Related coverage
ReportQA: QA-Based Radiology Report Evaluation
arXiv · Jun 17, 2026
OpenMedQ: Broad Open Pretraining for Medical Vision-Language Models
arXiv · Jun 12, 2026
HarMoE: Multi-Source Chest Radiograph Pretraining with Dataset-Disentangled Experts
arXiv · Aug 5, 2026
Comprehensive language-image pre-training for 3D medical image understanding
arXiv · Aug 19, 2026