aiqbench analysis
VocalAffectBench reveals that current AI audio models struggle significantly to identify discrete vocal emotions from raw audio alone, achieving only 35.5% average accuracy across six baselines. While neutral states are detected with reasonable reliability, non-neutral emotions like fear and surprise remain highly fragile, highlighting a critical gap for voice agent workflows. This benchmark establishes a necessary baseline for future research aimed at improving affective computing capabilities in speech systems.
VocalAffectBench: Evaluating Vocal Emotion Recognition in AI Audio Models
arXiv:2608.28932v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Voice products increasingly need affective cues that are present in speech but absent from transcripts. We introduce VocalAffectBench, a public, test-only benchmark for evaluating whether AI audio models can identify expressed vocal emotion from raw audio. The benchmark contains 273 human-recorded English WAV clips from 51 speaker accounts totaling 1.95 hours across seven labels: angry, disgusted, fearful, happy, neutral, sad, and surprised, with 39 clips per class. All baselines are evaluated from audio alone, without transcripts or contextual metadata. Across six released baselines, average accuracy is 35.5%. The strongest baseline, gemini_3_5_flash, reaches 46.5% on the seven-way task, above the 14.3% random baseline but far from robust emotion recognition. A secondary valence-bucket analysis maps labels into positive, neutral, and negative classes, excluding surprised because its valence is ambiguous. Aggregate accuracy under this coarser view is 50.9%. Performance is highly uneven across classes. By recall, neutral is identified most reliably at 75.6% averaged across baselines, while surprised and fearful reach only 10.7% and 15.4%, respectively. These results show that the evaluated baselines can extract some affective signal from speech, but discrete expressed-emotion recognition remains fragile, especially for non-neutral emotions that are often most important in voice agent workflows.
Abstract:Voice products increasingly need affective cues that are present in speech but absent from transcripts. We introduce VocalAffectBench, a public, test-only benchmark for evaluating whether AI audio models can identify expressed vocal emotion from raw audio. The benchmark contains 273 human-recorded English WAV clips from 51 speaker accounts totaling 1.95 hours across seven labels: angry, disgusted, fearful, happy, neutral, sad, and surprised, with 39 clips per class. All baselines are evaluated from audio alone, without transcripts or contextual metadata. Across six released baselines, average accuracy is 35.5%. The strongest baseline, gemini_3_5_flash, reaches 46.5% on the seven-way task, above the 14.3% random baseline but far from robust emotion recognition. A secondary valence-bucket analysis maps labels into positive, neutral, and negative classes, excluding surprised because its valence is ambiguous. Aggregate accuracy under this coarser view is 50.9%. Performance is highly uneven across classes. By recall, neutral is identified most reliably at 75.6% averaged across baselines, while surprised and fearful reach only 10.7% and 15.4%, respectively. These results show that the evaluated baselines can extract some affective signal from speech, but discrete expressed-emotion recognition remains fragile, especially for non-neutral emotions that are often most important in voice agent workflows.
6 pages, 6 tables. Benchmark, baseline predictions, and aggregate results are publicly available
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Sound (cs.SD)
arXiv:2608.28932 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2608.28932v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28932 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 306 words
Related coverage
Titans-as-a-Layer: Test-Time Memory for Conversational Speech Emotion Recognition
arXiv · Jun 9, 2026
Finding Emotions Where They Belong: Rethinking Audio Emotion Recognition through Masked Temporal Affective Grounding
arXiv · Sep 29, 2026
VoiceNet: Fine-Grained Voice Understanding Beyond Emotion at Scale
arXiv · Sep 29, 2026
Anonymization, Not Elimination: Utility-Preserved Speech Anonymization
arXiv · Sep 5, 2026