aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces TSAE, a structured sparse autoencoder designed to enhance the interpretability of time-series forecasting models by decomposing hidden states into inspectable features. By enforcing constraints on cross-variable structure and temporal continuity, it offers a more reliable method for assessing model reliability in critical applications like energy dispatch and industrial operations. The accompanying TSEVAL protocol provides a standardized framework for auditing feature fidelity and physical calibration, addressing key gaps in current explanation techniques.
TSAE: Structured Sparse Autoencoders for Interpreting Time-Series Forecasting Models
arXiv:2610.04925v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Time-series forecasting informs critical decisions in energy dispatch, industrial operations, and environmental monitoring; understanding the patterns models rely on is essential for assessing reliability and identifying failures. Input attribution identifies important variables and time segments but offers limited insight into internal features, while standard sparse autoencoder (SAE) objectives do not directly constrain cross-variable structure or temporal continuity. We introduce TSAE, a structured sparse autoencoder for forecasting representations that decomposes hidden states into individually inspectable features. TSAE organizes cross-variable structure through shared and variable-routed private dictionaries, separates feature detection from magnitude estimation with gated encoding, and constrains neighboring sparse-code changes according to raw-segment similarity. These mechanisms support analysis of variable context, activation strength, and temporal evolution. Forecast-consistency fine-tuning further improves preservation of the frozen forecaster's outputs. The accompanying TSEVAL protocol separately audits fidelity, feature coherence, and physical calibration to ground feature interpretation. In three-seed experiments with frozen PatchTST on ETTh1, ETTh2, and ETTm1, TSAE achieves the lowest hidden-state reconstruction error, normalized forecast-reconstruction error (NFRE), and feature transition rate among five SAEs at comparable per-token activity. NFRE decreases by 4.3-26.4% relative to the next-best mean. Dataset-dependent tradeoffs in selectivity, physical correlation, and calibration show that fidelity and temporal-stability gains require independent semantic validation to support feature interpretation.
Abstract:Time-series forecasting informs critical decisions in energy dispatch, industrial operations, and environmental monitoring; understanding the patterns models rely on is essential for assessing reliability and identifying failures. Input attribution identifies important variables and time segments but offers limited insight into internal features, while standard sparse autoencoder (SAE) objectives do not directly constrain cross-variable structure or temporal continuity. We introduce TSAE, a structured sparse autoencoder for forecasting representations that decomposes hidden states into individually inspectable features. TSAE organizes cross-variable structure through shared and variable-routed private dictionaries, separates feature detection from magnitude estimation with gated encoding, and constrains neighboring sparse-code changes according to raw-segment similarity. These mechanisms support analysis of variable context, activation strength, and temporal evolution. Forecast-consistency fine-tuning further improves preservation of the frozen forecaster's outputs. The accompanying TSEVAL protocol separately audits fidelity, feature coherence, and physical calibration to ground feature interpretation. In three-seed experiments with frozen PatchTST on ETTh1, ETTh2, and ETTm1, TSAE achieves the lowest hidden-state reconstruction error, normalized forecast-reconstruction error (NFRE), and feature transition rate among five SAEs at comparable per-token activity. NFRE decreases by 4.3-26.4% relative to the next-best mean. Dataset-dependent tradeoffs in selectivity, physical correlation, and calibration show that fidelity and temporal-stability gains require independent semantic validation to support feature interpretation.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2610.04925 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2610.04925v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04925 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 302 words
Related coverage
Interpretable deep convolutional model for nonlinear multivariate time series in complex systems
arXiv · Jun 10, 2026
Differentiable latent structure discovery for interpretable forecasting in clinical time series
arXiv · Jul 21, 2026
SCENARIODIFF: A Scenario-level Guidance Framework for Multimodal Time Series Forecasting--Extended Version
arXiv · Aug 20, 2026
NVExplain: Explaining Time Series Forecasting with Latent Trajectory Analysis and Structure-Preserving Surrogates
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026