Skip to content
aiqbench takeAI Research

aiqbench analysis

This research introduces a model-agnostic framework for interpreting time series forecasts by mapping predictions to specific historical lags through latent trajectory analysis. By generating structure-preserving surrogates, the method achieves high faithfulness and computational efficiency while maintaining temporal coherence in its explanations. The work directly addresses critical interpretability gaps in high-stakes forecasting applications where understanding horizon-specific influences is essential.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

NVExplain: Explaining Time Series Forecasting with Latent Trajectory Analysis and Structure-Preserving Surrogates

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2608.25080v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Time series forecasting models are widely used in high-stakes settings, yet their predictions remain difficult to interpret because existing post-hoc methods often ignore temporal dependence and fail to provide horizon-specific explanations. We propose a model-agnostic explainability framework that explains forecasting predictions by attributing each forecast horizon to temporally relevant historical lags. The framework models forecasting as a latent trajectory and introduces semantic flow to quantify how information evolves across time in the model's internal representations. By aggregating semantic flow, it constructs a lag-horizon attribution matrix that captures horizon-resolved temporal influence. To improve explainability, we further generate structure-preserving perturbations and fit sparse local surrogate models, producing human-readable and temporally coherent explanations. We evaluate the method using faithfulness and stability diagnostics across multiple benchmark datasets. Results show that the semantic-flow variant achieves competitive or superior faithfulness compared to standard post-hoc baselines, while being substantially more computationally efficient. Stability analysis further demonstrates that the explanations are robust and identifies regimes where interpretation should be applied with caution.

Abstract:Time series forecasting models are widely used in high-stakes settings, yet their predictions remain difficult to interpret because existing post-hoc methods often ignore temporal dependence and fail to provide horizon-specific explanations. We propose a model-agnostic explainability framework that explains forecasting predictions by attributing each forecast horizon to temporally relevant historical lags. The framework models forecasting as a latent trajectory and introduces semantic flow to quantify how information evolves across time in the model's internal representations. By aggregating semantic flow, it constructs a lag-horizon attribution matrix that captures horizon-resolved temporal influence. To improve explainability, we further generate structure-preserving perturbations and fit sparse local surrogate models, producing human-readable and temporally coherent explanations. We evaluate the method using faithfulness and stability diagnostics across multiple benchmark datasets. Results show that the semantic-flow variant achieves competitive or superior faithfulness compared to standard post-hoc baselines, while being substantially more computationally efficient. Stability analysis further demonstrates that the explanations are robust and identifies regimes where interpretation should be applied with caution.

Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (stat.ML)

arXiv:2608.25080 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2608.25080v1 [cs.LG] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.25080 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words

Related coverage