aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Trust Region Q Adjoint Matching (TRQAM), a novel algorithm designed to stabilize off-policy reinforcement learning for pretrained flow policies by adaptively controlling path-space KL divergence. By integrating a trust-region parameter directly into the sampling process, TRQAM mitigates the exponential error amplification inherent in critic-guided methods, achieving a significant 68% success rate on OGBench tasks compared to previous baselines. The work represents a meaningful advancement in the stability and performance of offline reinforcement learning frameworks.
Trust Region Q Adjoint Matching
arXiv:2605.27079v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Off-policy reinforcement learning of pretrained flow policies remains challenging due to the instability of optimization arising from the multi-step sampling process. Recently, Q-learning with Adjoint Matching (QAM) addressed this by recasting policy improvement as a stochastic optimal control (SOC) problem guided by a learned critic. However, QAM inherits a fundamental fragility of critic-guided improvement, since small critic errors can be exponentially amplified and often lead to performance collapse. This paper introduces Trust Region Q Adjoint Matching (TRQAM), a stable off-policy fine-tuning algorithm that adaptively controls the path-space KL between the fine-tuned and pretrained policies through projected dual descent. Specifically, we adapt a trust-region parameter $\lambda$ inside the sampling process of the flow policy and prove that $\lambda$ exactly weights the path-space KL in the SOC objective. As a result, our method can tightly control the deviation from the pretrained policy within a prescribed KL budget, achieving stable off-policy RL. Through experiments on 50 OGBench tasks, TRQAM consistently outperforms prior methods in both offline RL and offline-to-online RL. In particular, TRQAM achieves an overall success rate of 68% in offline RL, substantially improving over the strongest baseline at 46%.
Abstract:Off-policy reinforcement learning of pretrained flow policies remains challenging due to the instability of optimization arising from the multi-step sampling process. Recently, Q-learning with Adjoint Matching (QAM) addressed this by recasting policy improvement as a stochastic optimal control (SOC) problem guided by a learned critic. However, QAM inherits a fundamental fragility of critic-guided improvement, since small critic errors can be exponentially amplified and often lead to performance collapse. This paper introduces Trust Region Q Adjoint Matching (TRQAM), a stable off-policy fine-tuning algorithm that adaptively controls the path-space KL between the fine-tuned and pretrained policies through projected dual descent. Specifically, we adapt a trust-region parameter $\lambda$ inside the sampling process of the flow policy and prove that $\lambda$ exactly weights the path-space KL in the SOC objective. As a result, our method can tightly control the deviation from the pretrained policy within a prescribed KL budget, achieving stable off-policy RL. Through experiments on 50 OGBench tasks, TRQAM consistently outperforms prior methods in both offline RL and offline-to-online RL. In particular, TRQAM achieves an overall success rate of 68% in offline RL, substantially improving over the strongest baseline at 46%.
NeurIPS 2026. Code: this https URL, Blog: this https URL
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Robotics (cs.RO)
arXiv:2605.27079 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2605.27079v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27079 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 295 words
Related coverage
[Paper] Distillation for Incrimination and Distillation for Capabilities
LessWrong · Oct 9, 2026

Koopman Theory and Metaethics
LessWrong · Sep 19, 2026
MpSub: A Momentum $p$-Dimensional Subspace Trust-Region Method for Derivative-Free Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models
arXiv · Sep 9, 2026
When Can We Trust the Matching Principle? Robust Deployment Geometry Under Finite-Sample and Model Uncertainty
arXiv · Oct 6, 2026