aiqbench analysis
This study reveals that machine translation functions in LLMs are modular, with distinct attention heads specializing in either target language generation or semantic equivalence. By isolating these sparse components, researchers can achieve instruction-free performance comparable to prompting while selectively disrupting specific translation capabilities. This mechanistic insight offers a practical pathway for optimizing and debugging translation models without relying on external instructions.
Translation Heads: Disentangling meaning from language in LLM-based machine translation
arXiv:2602.04613v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) seeks to explain how neural networks implement their capabilities, but the scale of Large Language Models (LLMs) has limited prior MI work in Machine Translation (MT) to word-level analyses. We study sentence-level MT from a mechanistic perspective by analyzing attention heads to understand how LLMs internally encode and distribute translation functions. We decompose MT into two subtasks: producing text in the target language (i.e. target language identification) and preserving the input sentence's meaning (i.e. sentence equivalence). Across three families of open-source models and 20 translation directions, we find that distinct, sparse sets of attention heads specialize in each subtask. Based on this insight, we construct subtask-specific steering vectors and show that modifying just 1% of the relevant heads enables instruction-free MT performance comparable to instruction-based prompting, while ablating these heads selectively disrupts their corresponding translation functions.
Abstract:Mechanistic Interpretability (MI) seeks to explain how neural networks implement their capabilities, but the scale of Large Language Models (LLMs) has limited prior MI work in Machine Translation (MT) to word-level analyses. We study sentence-level MT from a mechanistic perspective by analyzing attention heads to understand how LLMs internally encode and distribute translation functions. We decompose MT into two subtasks: producing text in the target language (i.e. target language identification) and preserving the input sentence's meaning (i.e. sentence equivalence). Across three families of open-source models and 20 translation directions, we find that distinct, sparse sets of attention heads specialize in each subtask. Based on this insight, we construct subtask-specific steering vectors and show that modifying just 1% of the relevant heads enables instruction-free MT performance comparable to instruction-based prompting, while ablating these heads selectively disrupts their corresponding translation functions.
Computation and Language (cs.CL)
arXiv:2602.04613 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2602.04613v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.04613 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 232 words
Related coverage
Translators as Invisible Teachers of AI: Copyright, Translation Memory, and the Political Economy of Linguistic Data
arXiv · Oct 26, 2026
ProAct: Harnessing Streaming Motion Generation and Agentic Reasoning for Real-Time Embodied Social Interaction
arXiv · Sep 4, 2026
Beyond Words Alone: Disentangling Distributed Evidence for Visually Grounded Cultural Translation
arXiv · Oct 27, 2026
Contrastive Branch Policy Optimization
arXiv · Aug 27, 2026