Off-topic for aiqbench
This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.
Towards an Intelligent Decision Engine for Smart Contract Deployment
arXiv:2610.24198v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Layer 2 (L2) blockchain solutions emerged in recent years, predominantly in the Ethereum ecosystem, as a viable option for scaling a main blockchain network (L1). However, the selection of a L2 solution for deploying smart contracts backing blockchain applications is a decision that depends on many factors, such as costs, efficiency, popularity, and stability. We propose here a systematic methodology to help with this decision making process by using a set of relevant metrics and introducing user-defined profiles that capture different priorities among these metrics. We collect the major categories of smart contracts from a community-maintained data source, and we gather transactions for a six months period from three major L2 solutions: Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. For each contract category and each blockchain, we compute a set of metrics and scores tailored to each user profile. By applying our methodology, we identify a clear bias in the classification, showing which L2 solutions are better suited for particular application types and user profiles.
Abstract:Layer 2 (L2) blockchain solutions emerged in recent years, predominantly in the Ethereum ecosystem, as a viable option for scaling a main blockchain network (L1). However, the selection of a L2 solution for deploying smart contracts backing blockchain applications is a decision that depends on many factors, such as costs, efficiency, popularity, and stability. We propose here a systematic methodology to help with this decision making process by using a set of relevant metrics and introducing user-defined profiles that capture different priorities among these metrics. We collect the major categories of smart contracts from a community-maintained data source, and we gather transactions for a six months period from three major L2 solutions: Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base. For each contract category and each blockchain, we compute a set of metrics and scores tailored to each user profile. By applying our methodology, we identify a clear bias in the classification, showing which L2 solutions are better suited for particular application types and user profiles.
Software Engineering (cs.SE); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
arXiv:2610.24198 [cs.SE]
(or arXiv:2610.24198v1 [cs.SE] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.24198 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 261 words
Related coverage
Intelligent Base Station Deployment in Urban Wireless Networks: A Geographic Data-Informed Digital Twin Approach
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026

Gate AI Training, Not Just Releases
LessWrong · Sep 28, 2026
Toward Pre-Deployment Assurance for Enterprise AI Agents: Ontology-Grounded Simulation and Trust Certification
arXiv · Jun 6, 2026
Constitutive Priors for Machine Intelligence: A Legitimacy Theory of the Artificial Physical World
arXiv · Aug 18, 2026