Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

This paper presents a randomized algorithm achieving optimal $O(\sqrt d)$ regret bounds for online inverse linear optimization, utilizing multiscale matrix weights on polynomial feature spaces. The method remains robust even without prior knowledge of the time horizon and preserves these theoretical guarantees when implemented via rational oracles relative to linear-optimization queries. While computational efficiency regarding input length remains an open question, the result advances the theoretical limits of learning in constrained action sets.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Tight Regret Bound for Online Inverse Linear Optimization via Multiscale Matrix Weights

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.26978v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study online inverse linear optimization with a fixed unknown linear utility: in each round, an environment presents a compact action set, the learner recommends an action from it, and the environment returns an action that maximizes the utility over the same set. When the utility vector and the actions lie in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean unit ball, we give a randomized algorithm whose regret---the cumulative utility shortfall relative to optimal actions---is $O(\sqrt d)$ in expectation for every time horizon, without knowledge of the horizon. The dependence on $d$ is optimal up to a constant factor by the known $\Omega(\sqrt d)$ lower bound for horizons $T\ge d$. Our algorithm maintains matrix multiplicative weights on polynomial feature spaces at geometrically spaced scales. It selects a recommendation distribution by solving a linear program and updates its score matrices by comparing the available actions with the feedback action. With rational oracle outputs and feedback actions, an implementation computable relative to a linear-optimization oracle preserves the $O(\sqrt d)$ regret bound. Whether the same rate is attainable with running time polynomial in the dimension, horizon, and input length remains open.

Abstract:We study online inverse linear optimization with a fixed unknown linear utility: in each round, an environment presents a compact action set, the learner recommends an action from it, and the environment returns an action that maximizes the utility over the same set. When the utility vector and the actions lie in the $d$-dimensional Euclidean unit ball, we give a randomized algorithm whose regret---the cumulative utility shortfall relative to optimal actions---is $O(\sqrt d)$ in expectation for every time horizon, without knowledge of the horizon. The dependence on $d$ is optimal up to a constant factor by the known $\Omega(\sqrt d)$ lower bound for horizons $T\ge d$. Our algorithm maintains matrix multiplicative weights on polynomial feature spaces at geometrically spaced scales. It selects a recommendation distribution by solving a linear program and updates its score matrices by comparing the available actions with the feedback action. With rational oracle outputs and feedback actions, an implementation computable relative to a linear-optimization oracle preserves the $O(\sqrt d)$ regret bound. Whether the same rate is attainable with running time polynomial in the dimension, horizon, and input length remains open.

Machine Learning (stat.ML); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2609.26978 [stat.ML]

(or arXiv:2609.26978v1 [stat.ML] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.26978 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 286 words

Related coverage