aiqbench analysis
This paper introduces Small-Gradient Skipping (SGS), a novel mechanism for online inverse integer linear optimization that eliminates the $\log T$ regret factor by skipping updates when no mistake occurs. By applying SGS to algorithms like Online Newton Step and MetaGrad, it achieves finite mistake bounds and improved dimension dependence specifically for integer programming contexts without relying on computationally expensive center-of-gravity calculations.
Online Inverse Integer Linear Optimization via Small-Gradient Skipping: Constant Regret and Finite Mistakes
arXiv:2609.09809v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: In online inverse linear optimization, the learner predicts a weight at each round, observes the optimal action of the agent, and updates its prediction. In the general setting, the gap of $\log T$ between the regret upper bound $O(d \log T)$ and the lower bound $\Omega(d)$ is unresolved (here $T$ is the total number of rounds and $d$ is the dimension). When the action set is M-convex, the regret is known to be bounded by $O(d \log d)$, but the method attaining it computes a center of gravity at every round. This paper therefore proposes Small-Gradient Skipping (SGS), a mechanism that skips the update at rounds without a mistake in the case where the correct action is uniformly separated from the other candidates, and applies it to online gradient descent, the online Newton step, and MetaGrad. The number of mistakes is then bounded, for all three, by a quantity independent of $T$; and for the online Newton step and for MetaGrad with SGS, the dimension dependence of the regret becomes $O(d^2)$ when the forward problem is an integer linear program, that is, the factor $\log T$ is removed. Moreover, when the action set is M-convex, the regret is bounded efficiently without computing a center of gravity.
Abstract:In online inverse linear optimization, the learner predicts a weight at each round, observes the optimal action of the agent, and updates its prediction. In the general setting, the gap of $\log T$ between the regret upper bound $O(d \log T)$ and the lower bound $\Omega(d)$ is unresolved (here $T$ is the total number of rounds and $d$ is the dimension). When the action set is M-convex, the regret is known to be bounded by $O(d \log d)$, but the method attaining it computes a center of gravity at every round. This paper therefore proposes Small-Gradient Skipping (SGS), a mechanism that skips the update at rounds without a mistake in the case where the correct action is uniformly separated from the other candidates, and applies it to online gradient descent, the online Newton step, and MetaGrad. The number of mistakes is then bounded, for all three, by a quantity independent of $T$; and for the online Newton step and for MetaGrad with SGS, the dimension dependence of the regret becomes $O(d^2)$ when the forward problem is an integer linear program, that is, the factor $\log T$ is removed. Moreover, when the action set is M-convex, the regret is bounded efficiently without computing a center of gravity.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Data Structures and Algorithms (cs.DS); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2609.09809 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2609.09809v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.09809 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 309 words
Related coverage

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · Aug 3, 2026

Build a Physical AI model factory with NVIDIA Cosmos 3 on SageMaker HyperPod
AWS · Sep 4, 2026
Running Variational Quantum Eigensolver with Qiskit Aer on AMD Instinct
AMD · May 29, 2026
Links #5: 2026/07
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026