Skip to content
aiqbench takeQuantum Computing

aiqbench analysis

This paper challenges the foundational axiom of quantum mechanics regarding the correspondence between observables and self-adjoint operators, proposing a re-evaluation of the noncommutative algebra used to formalize measurement procedures. By scrutinizing the empirical interpretation of all observables simultaneously, the authors suggest that current mathematical frameworks may require adjustment to better align with physical experience. This theoretical critique directly impacts the core principles of quantum computing and quantum information theory.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

The parliament of observers - Against the observable axiom of quantum mechanics

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.07254v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences' may at times give the impression that natural science, especially modern theoretical physics, is all but a formal apparatus. However, a key challenge of physics remains to align everyday notions of experience -- be it directly or mediated through instruments of arbitrary sophistication -- with their mathematical formalisation. This applies in particular to quantum theory, arguably the most successful theory of physics ever invented. One of its core assumptions postulates: $Observables\ correspond\ with\ self-adjoint\ operators.$ Here, we argue that already this most basic premise about the quantum formalism falls apart under careful scrutiny, at least when understood for all observables at once. In other words, we challenge the role of the noncommutative algebra of bounded operators as an adequate formalisation of the 'algebra of observables', understood as (equivalence classes of) measurement procedures that admit a coherent empirical interpretation.

Abstract:The 'unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences' may at times give the impression that natural science, especially modern theoretical physics, is all but a formal apparatus. However, a key challenge of physics remains to align everyday notions of experience -- be it directly or mediated through instruments of arbitrary sophistication -- with their mathematical formalisation. This applies in particular to quantum theory, arguably the most successful theory of physics ever invented. One of its core assumptions postulates: $Observables\ correspond\ with\ self-adjoint\ operators.$ Here, we argue that already this most basic premise about the quantum formalism falls apart under careful scrutiny, at least when understood for all observables at once. In other words, we challenge the role of the noncommutative algebra of bounded operators as an adequate formalisation of the 'algebra of observables', understood as (equivalence classes of) measurement procedures that admit a coherent empirical interpretation.

arXiv:2610.07254 [quant-ph]

(or arXiv:2610.07254v1 [quant-ph] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.07254 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 238 words

Related coverage