aiqbench analysis
This paper challenges the standard interpretation of Bell's theorem by arguing that Quantum Mechanics, when described via von Neumann's measurement theory, inherently assumes statistical independence without requiring non-local effects. The analysis suggests that foundational assumptions regarding quantum non-locality may need revision, which could significantly impact the security models for device-independent randomness generation and Quantum Key Distribution protocols.
Quantum Mechanical description of Bell's experiment assumes Locality
arXiv:2002.12153v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In the usual derivation of Bell's inequalities, Locality is assumed to justify statistical independence of the outcomes of observations performed in remote stations; as the inequalities are observed to be violated, it is concluded that these outcomes are statistically dependent, and hence, that non-Local effects exist. Here it is shown that the simplest description of Bell's experiment according to the canon of von Neumann's theory of measurement assumes statistical independence of those outcomes. In other words, the straightforward description of Bell's experiment according to Quantum Mechanics (which, of course, violates Bell's inequalities) does not assume non-Locality. Summing up this and other related results it is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects. In addition to its foundational significance, this conclusion has practical impact in the fields of quantum-certified and device-independent randomness generation and on the vulnerability of Quantum Key Distribution schemes, which are based on the existence of quantum non-Locality as an axiom.
Abstract:In the usual derivation of Bell's inequalities, Locality is assumed to justify statistical independence of the outcomes of observations performed in remote stations; as the inequalities are observed to be violated, it is concluded that these outcomes are statistically dependent, and hence, that non-Local effects exist. Here it is shown that the simplest description of Bell's experiment according to the canon of von Neumann's theory of measurement assumes statistical independence of those outcomes. In other words, the straightforward description of Bell's experiment according to Quantum Mechanics (which, of course, violates Bell's inequalities) does not assume non-Locality. Summing up this and other related results it is concluded that, within the framework of Quantum Mechanics, there is no reason to believe in the existence of non-Local effects. In addition to its foundational significance, this conclusion has practical impact in the fields of quantum-certified and device-independent randomness generation and on the vulnerability of Quantum Key Distribution schemes, which are based on the existence of quantum non-Locality as an axiom.
arXiv:2002.12153 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2002.12153v2 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2002.12153 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 255 words
Related coverage

Konrad Zuse, Who Built The First Programmable Computer And Then Argued The Universe Is One
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 13, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

The E91 Protocol, Entanglement-Based Quantum Key Distribution
Quantum Zeitgeist · Jun 15, 2026
On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part II: Bell inequalities
arXiv · Sep 28, 2026