aiqbench analysis
This paper re-examines the foundational debate surrounding Bell inequalities by rigorously applying Kolmogorov's probability theory to analyze contextuality in quantum experiments. The authors demonstrate that apparent violations of these inequalities can be understood through contextual models where detector behavior depends on settings, challenging standard interpretations of locality and realism without relying on specific quantum mechanical structures. For readers focused on the theoretical underpinnings of quantum information, this work clarifies conceptual misunderstandings often attributed to experimental loopholes rather than fundamental non-locality.
On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part II: Bell inequalities
arXiv:2609.31075v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Among the various "no-go theorems" in the foundations of quantum mechanics, Bell inequalities are among the few, which do not implicitly rely on the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Instead, Bell inequalities are commonly understood to rest on Kolmogorov's theory of probability and a "locality" assumption. Physical evidence supporting their violation is hence taken as evidence against at least one of these two assumptions. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the physical debate on Bell inequalities from the point of view of Kolmogorov's theory of probability, focusing on the Bell-Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt inequality (BCHSH inequality). The central contribution is the motivation and mathematical study of the notion of contextuality in Bell experiments: in so-called contextual Bell models the detectors themselves behave randomly and the distribution of the random detector parameters depends on the chosen detector settings. It is shown how even "classical" Bell experiments motivate such a description. The need to account for contextuality was pointed out before by de la Pe\~na, Cetto, Brody, Lochak, Bohm, Hiley and others. A broad class of contextual models is proven to satisfy the BCHSH inequality, thereby generalizing a previous result by Gill and Lambare. Nonetheless, even under strong locality requirements, contextual Bell models may violate the BCHSH inequality: based on work by Popescu and Rohrlich, we consider a "proof of concept" example exhibiting the maximum possible violation. Contrary to the much debated "loopholes" in empirical tests of Bell inequalities, contextuality thus reveals a conceptual misunderstanding in the physical conclusions commonly drawn from Bell inequality violations.
Title:On the applicability of Kolmogorov's theory of probability to the description of quantum phenomena. Part II: Bell inequalities
Abstract:Among the various "no-go theorems" in the foundations of quantum mechanics, Bell inequalities are among the few, which do not implicitly rely on the mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. Instead, Bell inequalities are commonly understood to rest on Kolmogorov's theory of probability and a "locality" assumption. Physical evidence supporting their violation is hence taken as evidence against at least one of these two assumptions. This work provides a comprehensive analysis of the physical debate on Bell inequalities from the point of view of Kolmogorov's theory of probability, focusing on the Bell-Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt inequality (BCHSH inequality). The central contribution is the motivation and mathematical study of the notion of contextuality in Bell experiments: in so-called contextual Bell models the detectors themselves behave randomly and the distribution of the random detector parameters depends on the chosen detector settings. It is shown how even "classical" Bell experiments motivate such a description. The need to account for contextuality was pointed out before by de la Peña, Cetto, Brody, Lochak, Bohm, Hiley and others. A broad class of contextual models is proven to satisfy the BCHSH inequality, thereby generalizing a previous result by Gill and Lambare. Nonetheless, even under strong locality requirements, contextual Bell models may violate the BCHSH inequality: based on work by Popescu and Rohrlich, we consider a "proof of concept" example exhibiting the maximum possible violation. Contrary to the much debated "loopholes" in empirical tests of Bell inequalities, contextuality thus reveals a conceptual misunderstanding in the physical conclusions commonly drawn from Bell inequality violations.
arXiv:2609.31075 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2609.31075v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31075 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Reddiger_Bell_example7_data.dat
Reddiger_Bell_example7_source_code.wls
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 362 words
Related coverage
The Illusion of Explanatory Depth is the Secret of Our Success
LessWrong · Jul 31, 2026

Research directions in condensation: varieties of objectivity
AI Alignment Forum · Jul 28, 2026

How QBism Made the Wavefunction All About You
Quantum Zeitgeist · Aug 30, 2026

Podcast with Johannes Pollanen, Co-founder of EeroQ and a Professor of Physics at Michigan State University
Quantum Computing Report · Oct 17, 2026