aiqbench analysis
This research establishes the asymptotic scaling of collapse time for weak measurements across N entangled sites, correcting prior double-logarithmic assumptions with a proven logarithmic limit. The study refines the theoretical understanding of measurement dynamics in quantum systems by linking finite measurement outcomes to specific confidence thresholds.
The collapse time of weak measurement on $N$ entangled sites
arXiv:2610.04556v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: We determine the time required for local weak measurements to collapse to one occupied site in an initial superposition of $N$ alternatives in the model of PRA 111, 032217 (2025). For equal initial occupation probabilities and a fixed confidence threshold $1-\delta$, we prove $T_N/\ln N\to1/2$ in $L^1$, with time measured in units of the characteristic measurement time $\tau_m$ of each detector. We also connect the asymptotic stabilization theorem of that work to a finite measurement: the first site to reach $1-\delta$ is the eventual outcome with conditional probability exactly $1-\delta$. The result corrects the previously proposed double-logarithmic asymptotic scaling. The finite-range numerical fit does not determine a constant asymptotic correction or a precise finite-$N$ law.
Abstract:We determine the time required for local weak measurements to collapse to one occupied site in an initial superposition of $N$ alternatives in the model of PRA 111, 032217 (2025). For equal initial occupation probabilities and a fixed confidence threshold $1-\delta$, we prove $T_N/\ln N\to1/2$ in $L^1$, with time measured in units of the characteristic measurement time $\tau_m$ of each detector. We also connect the asymptotic stabilization theorem of that work to a finite measurement: the first site to reach $1-\delta$ is the eventual outcome with conditional probability exactly $1-\delta$. The result corrects the previously proposed double-logarithmic asymptotic scaling. The finite-range numerical fit does not determine a constant asymptotic correction or a precise finite-$N$ law.
arXiv:2610.04556 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2610.04556v1 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.04556 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 206 words
Related coverage

Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 13, 2026

Entanglement growth in the dark intervals of a locally monitored free-fermion chain
Quantum Journal · Aug 3, 2026

Little Venice, Little Sparta: The UAE Statecraft Meets The War On Iran - Analysis
eurasiareview.com · Sep 24, 2026

Quantum Measurement, How Reading a Qubit Works
Quantum Zeitgeist · Sep 5, 2026