aiqbench analysis
The article definitively concludes that the human brain does not function as a quantum computer, citing Tegmark's decoherence calculations and experimental failures of Penrose's gravitational collapse model. While it acknowledges established instances of quantum biology like photosynthesis, it emphasizes that these phenomena lack the necessary coherence times for computational tasks in neural tissue. The analysis reinforces that thermal noise and electrical interference in biological systems prevent sustained quantum states required for processing.
Is The Brain A Quantum Computer? The Decoherence Numbers Say No

Key Takeaways The gap is ten orders of magnitude, not a close call. Tegmark’s 2000 calculation puts a superposition inside a microtubule at ten to the minus thirteen seconds and one across a neuron at ten to the minus twenty. Neurons work on timescales between a ten thousandth of a second and a second. The […]
The gap is ten orders of magnitude, not a close call. Tegmark’s 2000 calculation puts a superposition inside a microtubule at ten to the minus thirteen seconds and one across a neuron at ten to the minus twenty. Neurons work on timescales between a ten thousandth of a second and a second. The microtubule camp’s reply narrowed the gap without closing it. Hagan, Hameroff and Tuszynski recalculated at ten microseconds, which is still a hundred times too short. The further stretch to a tenth of a second rests on ordered water, metabolic pumping and actin gelation, none of which has been measured in living tissue. Orchestrated objective reduction needs physics that has been tested and failed. It requires Penrose’s own gravitational collapse mechanism. The parameter-free version of that model was ruled out by the Gran Sasso underground experiment and reported in Nature Physics. Nuclear spin is the one part still open. Matthew Fisher proposed that phosphorus nuclei in a calcium phosphate cluster could hold a state for around a day, because nuclear spins couple to their surroundings far more weakly than electrons do. The proposal has survived a decade and has also failed several of its own tests. Quantum biology…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 200 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage

Quantum Measurement, Information, and Time
scienceblog.com · Sep 23, 2026
Mental causation is not load-bearing
LessWrong · Jun 7, 2026

Podcast with Johannes Pollanen, Co-founder of EeroQ and a Professor of Physics at Michigan State University
Quantum Computing Report · Oct 17, 2026

Defence And UK Quantum: Who Buys, Who Builds, And What Has Been Tested
Quantum Zeitgeist · Oct 15, 2026