Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

Supervised Reward Inference introduces a novel framework that leverages supervised learning to infer rewards from human demonstrations exhibiting poor planning or non-optimal execution. Theoretically proven to be asymptotically Bayes-optimal, this method significantly advances inverse reinforcement learning by overcoming limitations of prior tabular approaches and handling arbitrary suboptimal behaviors in robotics tasks like Meta-World. Its successful generalization to action and goal prediction marks a robust step forward for aligning AI agents with complex human intent signals.
Sources coveringarXiv, AI Alignment Forum
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

Supervised Reward Inference

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2502.18447v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Existing approaches to reward inference typically assume that humans provide demonstrations according to specific behavior models. However, humans often indicate their goals through a wide range of behaviors, from actions that are suboptimal due to poor planning or execution to behaviors intended to communicate goals rather than achieve them. One existing solution for inferring rewards from such behavior $\unicode{x2013}$ provided it is drawn from the same distribution at training and deployment $\unicode{x2013}$ is to construct a dataset of behavior paired with known rewards, and to learn the mapping from behavior to rewards; however, prior methods in this family face notable limitations, such as restrictions to tabular settings. Given such a dataset, we propose instead that supervised learning offers a parsimonious yet powerful solution, which we term Supervised Reward Inference (SRI). Theoretically, we prove that SRI is asymptotically Bayes-optimal under standard assumptions. Empirically, SRI achieves near-ceiling performance on a prior benchmark for reward inference from suboptimal behavior, while on Meta-World robotics tasks, it infers rewards from even arbitrarily suboptimal demonstrations as accurately as those demonstrations allow. Finally, we demonstrate our framework's universality with straightforward generalizations to action- and goal-prediction.

Abstract:Existing approaches to reward inference typically assume that humans provide demonstrations according to specific behavior models. However, humans often indicate their goals through a wide range of behaviors, from actions that are suboptimal due to poor planning or execution to behaviors intended to communicate goals rather than achieve them. One existing solution for inferring rewards from such behavior $\unicode{x2013}$ provided it is drawn from the same distribution at training and deployment $\unicode{x2013}$ is to construct a dataset of behavior paired with known rewards, and to learn the mapping from behavior to rewards; however, prior methods in this family face notable limitations, such as restrictions to tabular settings. Given such a dataset, we propose instead that supervised learning offers a parsimonious yet powerful solution, which we term Supervised Reward Inference (SRI). Theoretically, we prove that SRI is asymptotically Bayes-optimal under standard assumptions. Empirically, SRI achieves near-ceiling performance on a prior benchmark for reward inference from suboptimal behavior, while on Meta-World robotics tasks, it infers rewards from even arbitrarily suboptimal demonstrations as accurately as those demonstrations allow. Finally, we demonstrate our framework's universality with straightforward generalizations to action- and goal-prediction.

35 pages, 8 figures. Updated with public code link

Machine Learning (cs.LG)

arXiv:2502.18447 [cs.LG]

(or arXiv:2502.18447v3 [cs.LG] for this version)

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 208 words

Related coverage