Skip to content
aiqbench takeMachine Learning

aiqbench analysis

The paper tackles a concrete training problem for LLM-based agents that answer questions over knowledge graphs: rewards arrive only at the end of a trajectory, so it is hard to tell which individual operations helped. OpCredit assigns credit to each step by combining comparisons of terminal rewards across alternative operations with a measure of how each operation changes answer-relevant progress. The reported gains are on three standard KGQA benchmarks and three backbones, but readers should check how much the improvements depend on the reward design and the cost of the extra rollouts.
Source coveringarXiv
What this isA model's reading of the article and related coverage, written for aiqbench. Not the publisher's words.

OpCredit: Operation-Aware Policy Learning for Agentic Knowledge Graph Question Answering

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2610.21345v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Agentic knowledge graph question answering(KGQA) relies on sequences of executable operations, but trajectory-level rewards obscure their individual contributions. Successful trajectories may contain ineffective operations, while failed trajectories may contain useful ones. To assess individual operations, we propose OpCredit, an operationaware policy-learning framework that combines downstream outcome credit with immediate transition credit: Branch Outcome Credit (BOC) reuses ordinary rollouts to compare terminal task rewards observed after different operations under matched navigation contexts; Frontier Transition Credit (FTC) measures operation-induced changes in answer-conditioned frontier potential. The two complementary signals jointly supervise the corresponding decision spans during training, while inference uses only the learned policy and standard KG interface. Experiments on ComplexWebQuestions, WebQSP, and GrailQA across three backbones demonstrate consistent improvements in KGQA performance.

Abstract:Agentic knowledge graph question answering(KGQA) relies on sequences of executable operations, but trajectory-level rewards obscure their individual contributions. Successful trajectories may contain ineffective operations, while failed trajectories may contain useful ones. To assess individual operations, we propose OpCredit, an operationaware policy-learning framework that combines downstream outcome credit with immediate transition credit: Branch Outcome Credit (BOC) reuses ordinary rollouts to compare terminal task rewards observed after different operations under matched navigation contexts; Frontier Transition Credit (FTC) measures operation-induced changes in answer-conditioned frontier potential. The two complementary signals jointly supervise the corresponding decision spans during training, while inference uses only the learned policy and standard KG interface. Experiments on ComplexWebQuestions, WebQSP, and GrailQA across three backbones demonstrate consistent improvements in KGQA performance.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2610.21345 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2610.21345v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.21345 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 215 words

Related coverage