Skip to content
Off-topic for aiqbench

Off-topic for aiqbench

This story was gathered from a source we follow but falls outside AI and quantum coverage, so there is no aiqbench take for it.

Speaker or Language? Explaining Variance in Charismatic Prosody Across Luxembourgish and French

arXiv2 min read

arXiv:2609.16275v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Charismatic speech is shaped by language and speaking style, yet their relative contribution in bilingual public speaking remains unclear. We analyzed spontaneous speeches of 10 politicians who address audiences in Luxembourgish and French, in highly comparable communicative contexts across languages. From 400 utterances, we extracted 41 acoustic-prosodic features linked to vocal charisma and fitted mixed-effects models to separate speaker- and language-related variance. Speaker identity accounted for most variance, whereas language explained less, but still showed systematic differences: French productions showed higher shimmer and phrase-final F0, indicative of a polite, respectful voice, while Luxembourgish productions exhibited stronger mid-frequency spectral energy, suggesting a more vocally present profile. These patterns align with the sociolinguistic roles of Luxembourgish as an informal identity language and French as a high-prestige institutional variety.

Title:Speaker or Language? Explaining Variance in Charismatic Prosody Across Luxembourgish and French

Abstract:Charismatic speech is shaped by language and speaking style, yet their relative contribution in bilingual public speaking remains unclear. We analyzed spontaneous speeches of 10 politicians who address audiences in Luxembourgish and French, in highly comparable communicative contexts across languages. From 400 utterances, we extracted 41 acoustic-prosodic features linked to vocal charisma and fitted mixed-effects models to separate speaker- and language-related variance. Speaker identity accounted for most variance, whereas language explained less, but still showed systematic differences: French productions showed higher shimmer and phrase-final F0, indicative of a polite, respectful voice, while Luxembourgish productions exhibited stronger mid-frequency spectral energy, suggesting a more vocally present profile. These patterns align with the sociolinguistic roles of Luxembourgish as an informal identity language and French as a high-prestige institutional variety.

Computation and Language (cs.CL)

arXiv:2609.16275 [cs.CL]

(or arXiv:2609.16275v1 [cs.CL] for this version)

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16275 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Full text under the publisher's open licence · 233 words

Related coverage