aiqbench analysis
This study investigates the efficacy of LLMs in simulating multilingual student-tutor dialogues for math feedback, revealing that English hints generally outperform localized ones across 11 languages. The findings are critical for developers aiming to build inclusive educational tools, as they highlight a significant gap between model capabilities and actual learning gains in non-English contexts.
Simulating Student-Tutor Interactions with LLMs for Multilingual Math Feedback
arXiv:2506.04920v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate formative feedback and instructional hints in English, making them increasingly relevant for AI-assisted education. However, their ability to provide effective instructional support across different languages, especially for mathematically grounded reasoning tasks, remains largely unexamined. In this work, we present the first large-scale simulation of multilingual student-tutor interactions using LLMs. A stronger model plays the role of the tutor, generating feedback in the form of hints, while a weaker model simulates the student. We explore 352 experimental settings across 11 typologically diverse languages, four state-of-the-art LLMs, and multiple prompting strategies to assess whether language-specific feedback leads to measurable learning gains. Our study examines how student input language, tutor feedback language, model choice, and language resource level jointly influence performance. Results show that English hints are generally preferred, even by multilingual student LLMs, with few exceptions that lead to improved student learning outcomes. These findings offer practical insights for developing multilingual, LLM-based educational tools that are both effective and inclusive.
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the ability to generate formative feedback and instructional hints in English, making them increasingly relevant for AI-assisted education. However, their ability to provide effective instructional support across different languages, especially for mathematically grounded reasoning tasks, remains largely unexamined. In this work, we present the first large-scale simulation of multilingual student-tutor interactions using LLMs. A stronger model plays the role of the tutor, generating feedback in the form of hints, while a weaker model simulates the student. We explore 352 experimental settings across 11 typologically diverse languages, four state-of-the-art LLMs, and multiple prompting strategies to assess whether language-specific feedback leads to measurable learning gains. Our study examines how student input language, tutor feedback language, model choice, and language resource level jointly influence performance. Results show that English hints are generally preferred, even by multilingual student LLMs, with few exceptions that lead to improved student learning outcomes. These findings offer practical insights for developing multilingual, LLM-based educational tools that are both effective and inclusive.
Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
arXiv:2506.04920 [cs.CL]
(or arXiv:2506.04920v2 [cs.CL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.04920 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 264 words
Related coverage
Who Am I? History-Aware Profiles for Student Simulation in Tutoring Dialogues
arXiv · Sep 1, 2026

What AI gets wrong and what failure teaches us
Microsoft Research · Oct 6, 2026

TutorMoments: Do AI tutors know when to help and when to hold back?
Hugging Face · Aug 7, 2026
PEARL: Training Socratic Tutors with Pedagogically Aligned Reinforcement Learning
arXiv · Sep 2, 2026