aiqbench analysis
This study demonstrates the feasibility of using fine-tuned large language models to automate qubit shuttling schedules in trapped-ion quantum computers, potentially reducing operation counts by up to 21% compared to hand-coded heuristics. While the models show promising cross-architecture generalization on specific branched designs, they currently fail to generate valid schedules for certain unseen architectures, highlighting remaining limitations in robustness. The work marks a significant step toward replacing manual routing logic with AI-driven compilation tools essential for scaling quantum hardware.
Shuttling Compiler for Trapped-Ion Quantum Computers Based on Fine-Tuned Large Language Models
arXiv:2512.18021v4 Announce Type: replace Abstract: In trapped-ion quantum computers, qubits must be shuttled between segments to interact. The routing logic that schedules these movements is written by hand for every new trap architecture. We present shuttling compilers based on five large language models (LLMs). Each LLM is fine-tuned on shuttling schedules produced by hand-coded heuristics for linear and branched one-dimensional trap architectures. We investigate how the shuttling operation counts of their schedules compare with those of the heuristics and how far they generalize to unseen architectures. For circuits of up to 16 qubits, the fine-tuned LLMs generate valid schedules on both training architectures, more often the fewer qubits a circuit has. In 12% of the compilations yielding a schedule, the best of ten runs needs up to 21% fewer operations than the heuristic baselines, after a rule-based post-processing step. A single run of one fine-tuned LLM produces a valid shuttling schedule for a previously unseen four-way branched architecture. This is preliminary evidence of cross-architecture generalization. On two other unseen architectures no LLM produces a valid schedule. Thus, LLM-learned shuttling compilation is feasible, and we show how far it currently reaches.
Abstract:In trapped-ion quantum computers, qubits must be shuttled between segments to interact. The routing logic that schedules these movements is written by hand for every new trap architecture. We present shuttling compilers based on five large language models (LLMs). Each LLM is fine-tuned on shuttling schedules produced by hand-coded heuristics for linear and branched one-dimensional trap architectures. We investigate how the shuttling operation counts of their schedules compare with those of the heuristics and how far they generalize to unseen architectures. For circuits of up to 16 qubits, the fine-tuned LLMs generate valid schedules on both training architectures, more often the fewer qubits a circuit has. In 12% of the compilations yielding a schedule, the best of ten runs needs up to 21% fewer operations than the heuristic baselines, after a rule-based post-processing step. A single run of one fine-tuned LLM produces a valid shuttling schedule for a previously unseen four-way branched architecture. This is preliminary evidence of cross-architecture generalization. On two other unseen architectures no LLM produces a valid schedule. Thus, LLM-learned shuttling compilation is feasible, and we show how far it currently reaches.
Quantum Physics (quant-ph); Emerging Technologies (cs.ET); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2512.18021 [quant-ph]
(or arXiv:2512.18021v4 [quant-ph] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.18021 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 283 words
Related coverage
Shuttling Compiler for Trapped-Ion Quantum Computers Based on Large Language Models
arXiv · Jun 15, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jul 25, 2026

News
Quantum Computing Report · Jun 7, 2026

IonQ, QuantumBasel Study Suggests Hybrid AI Workloads Could Gain Energy Advantages From Quantum Hardware as Systems Scale
The Quantum Insider · Jul 21, 2026