aiqbench analysis
This research advances Bayesian optimization by demonstrating that Gaussian Process Upper Confidence Bound (GP-UCB) algorithms can maintain uniform confidence bounds using a constant exploration parameter in time-varying environments. The authors derive sharper regret bounds dependent on the drift rate, offering improved theoretical guarantees for persistent-drift regimes without requiring exploration parameters to grow with the horizon.
Sharper Regret Bounds for Time-Varying Gaussian Process Bandits with Constant Exploration
arXiv:2608.18863v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: We study Bayesian optimization in a time-varying environment where the unknown reward function evolves according to a Gaussian process drift model. Existing GP-UCB analyses in this setting typically require the exploration parameter to grow with the horizon to maintain uniform confidence bounds. Using per-round local confidence events, we show that GP-UCB can instead be run with a constant exploration parameter and obtain an expected-regret bound whose coefficient depends on the drift rate. We also derive a sharper time-varying maximum-information-gain bound. For the squared exponential kernel, it yields $\tilde\gamma_T/T=\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\epsilon^{1/2})$ and expected average regret $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\epsilon^{1/4})$ in the persistent-drift regime. The same constant-exploration analysis also yields realized-regret guarantees. Simulations support the predicted logarithmic dependence of the bound-suggested exploration parameter on $1/\epsilon$.
Abstract:We study Bayesian optimization in a time-varying environment where the unknown reward function evolves according to a Gaussian process drift model. Existing GP-UCB analyses in this setting typically require the exploration parameter to grow with the horizon to maintain uniform confidence bounds. Using per-round local confidence events, we show that GP-UCB can instead be run with a constant exploration parameter and obtain an expected-regret bound whose coefficient depends on the drift rate. We also derive a sharper time-varying maximum-information-gain bound. For the squared exponential kernel, it yields $\tilde\gamma_T/T=\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\epsilon^{1/2})$ and expected average regret $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(\epsilon^{1/4})$ in the persistent-drift regime. The same constant-exploration analysis also yields realized-regret guarantees. Simulations support the predicted logarithmic dependence of the bound-suggested exploration parameter on $1/\epsilon$.
23 pages, 1 figure. Code included as ancillary files
Machine Learning (stat.ML); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
arXiv:2608.18863 [stat.ML]
(or arXiv:2608.18863v1 [stat.ML] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.18863 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
supplementary_code/README.md
supplementary_code/make_simulation_figure.py
supplementary_code/reproduce_all.py
supplementary_code/requirements.txt
supplementary_code/run_constant_beta_experiment.py
supplementary_code/run_log_beta_experiment.py
supplementary_code/tvgp_simulation.py
(2 additional files not shown) You must enabled JavaScript to view entire file list.
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 247 words
Related coverage
Reliable Scale-Free Bandits via Empirical Likelihood
arXiv · Oct 14, 2026
Gaussian Process Bandits for AI System Optimization with Selectively Verified Feedback
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026
ALMAB-DC: Active Learning, Multi-Armed Bandits, and Distributed Computing for Sequential Experimental Design and Black-Box Optimization
arXiv · Jun 5, 2026
Sharp analysis of linear ensemble sampling
arXiv · Jun 16, 2026