aiqbench analysis
This research provides a rigorous theoretical analysis of linear ensemble sampling in stochastic linear bandits, demonstrating its ability to match the regret bounds of Thompson sampling with comparable computational costs. By leveraging continuous-time Brownian motion representations, the study offers new insights into randomized exploration strategies that could influence future algorithmic designs for reinforcement learning and online optimization tasks.
Sharp analysis of linear ensemble sampling
arXiv:2602.08026v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: We analyse linear ensemble sampling (ES) with standard Gaussian perturbations in stochastic linear bandits. We show that for ensemble size $m=\Theta(d\log n)$, ES attains $\tilde O(d^{3/2}\sqrt n)$ high-probability regret, closing the gap to the Thompson sampling benchmark while keeping computation comparable. The proof brings a new perspective on randomized exploration in linear bandits by reducing the analysis to a time-uniform exceedance problem for $m$ independent Brownian motions. This continuous-time lens appears particularly natural here: it yields an exact representation of the relevant discrete-time processes, and we do not know another route to a sharp ES bound.
Abstract:We analyse linear ensemble sampling (ES) with standard Gaussian perturbations in stochastic linear bandits. We show that for ensemble size $m=\Theta(d\log n)$, ES attains $\tilde O(d^{3/2}\sqrt n)$ high-probability regret, closing the gap to the Thompson sampling benchmark while keeping computation comparable. The proof brings a new perspective on randomized exploration in linear bandits by reducing the analysis to a time-uniform exceedance problem for $m$ independent Brownian motions. This continuous-time lens appears particularly natural here: it yields an exact representation of the relevant discrete-time processes, and we do not know another route to a sharp ES bound.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
arXiv:2602.08026 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2602.08026v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.08026 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 191 words
Related coverage

A brief history of quantum vs classical computational advantage
Quantum Journal · Sep 1, 2026
Provable Anytime Ensemble Sampling Algorithms in Nonlinear Contextual Bandits
arXiv · Sep 24, 2026
Linear Ensemble Sampling with Smaller Ensembles
arXiv · Sep 15, 2026
Fundamental Limitations of QAOA on Constrained Problems and a Route to Exponential Enhancement
arXiv · Oct 15, 2026