aiqbench analysis
Shadow AI use is reported as higher among senior leaders than among other staff, but the headline figures rely on vendor telemetry from a single customer and on TrustedTech and Okta surveys. The article itself notes that some "unapproved" flags may reflect desktop-client misclassification, so organizations should verify which tools are actually in use before drawing conclusions about executive behavior or governance gaps.
Shadow AI in the C-Suite: Measure Leadership Use
Shadow AI is often framed as an employee problem. But industry research finds high rates among senior leaders, and Larridin Spark data shows why executive AI usage deserves a closer look.
Shadow AI is often framed as an employee problem. But industry research finds high rates among senior leaders, and Larridin Spark data shows why executive AI usage deserves a closer look. Shadow AI isn't limited to frontline employees. TrustedTech found that 65% of senior decision-makers used unapproved AI tools, compared with 31% of other employees. In one Larridin customer, 76% of the Leadership/Executive group's tracked AI interactions involved tools classified as unapproved, up 302% from the prior period. Some of that activity may reflect desktop-client classification issues, so the next step is to…
Excerpt shown under the publisher's RSS terms · 93 words · full text and figures are on the publisher's site
Related coverage
Turning Tech Talent Into Leadership Legacy
IEEE Spectrum · Sep 18, 2026
Into the Omniverse: How Open World Models Push the Frontier of Physical AI
NVIDIA · Aug 6, 2026
Measuring AI Leadership: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure for AI-Native Organizations
arXiv · Sep 17, 2026
CO.LAB Q launches with four quantum start-ups in Tennessee
Quantum Zeitgeist · Nov 2, 2026