aiqbench analysis
This research establishes the theoretical optimality limits of Sample Average Approximation (SAA) within a generalized framework for sequential stochastic optimization, moving beyond restrictive linear-cost assumptions. By unifying regret analysis across broader convexity conditions, it provides rigorous performance bounds that serve as essential benchmarks for evaluating future data-driven decision-making algorithms in inventory management and related fields.
Regret Optimality of Sample Average Approximation for Data-Driven Newsvendor Problems: A General Optimization Perspective
arXiv:2407.04900v2 Announce Type: replace Abstract: Numerous existing studies have examined the performance of Sample Average Approximation (SAA) in the fundamental newsvendor problem. Despite these advances, critical gaps remain in two aspects. First, existing works focus on the linear-cost newsvendor problem and heavily rely on the quantile expression of the optimal solution. As a result, their analytical methods limit generalizability to more general inventory problems, where the optimal solution is not a quantile of the demand distribution. Second, even within the linear-cost setting, notable gaps exist between the state-of-the-art regret lower bound and upper bound for SAA under various conditions. In this paper, we generalize the structure of the newsvendor problem to generic convexity conditions and provide a unified regret analysis of SAA for general sequential stochastic optimization problems. Our approach provides further insights to a broader range of data-driven inventory problems, improves both the upper and lower regret bounds, and establishes the regret rate optimality of SAA. Our lower bound identifies the performance limit achievable by any policy for sequential stochastic optimization and inventory management problems, offering important guidance for future policy design in this area. Moreover, in empirical studies, SAA's performance is frequently used as a benchmark for evaluating new algorithms. The regret rate optimality result provides strong support for its role in assessing other data-driven methods, benefiting both practitioners and researchers. Our new analysis techniques enrich the analysis tools for regret upper and lower bounds for data-driven decision-making problems and other general stochastic optimization problems.
Abstract:Numerous existing studies have examined the performance of Sample Average Approximation (SAA) in the fundamental newsvendor problem. Despite these advances, critical gaps remain in two aspects. First, existing works focus on the linear-cost newsvendor problem and heavily rely on the quantile expression of the optimal solution. As a result, their analytical methods limit generalizability to more general inventory problems, where the optimal solution is not a quantile of the demand distribution. Second, even within the linear-cost setting, notable gaps exist between the state-of-the-art regret lower bound and upper bound for SAA under various conditions. In this paper, we generalize the structure of the newsvendor problem to generic convexity conditions and provide a unified regret analysis of SAA for general sequential stochastic optimization problems. Our approach provides further insights to a broader range of data-driven inventory problems, improves both the upper and lower regret bounds, and establishes the regret rate optimality of SAA. Our lower bound identifies the performance limit achievable by any policy for sequential stochastic optimization and inventory management problems, offering important guidance for future policy design in this area. Moreover, in empirical studies, SAA's performance is frequently used as a benchmark for evaluating new algorithms. The regret rate optimality result provides strong support for its role in assessing other data-driven methods, benefiting both practitioners and researchers. Our new analysis techniques enrich the analysis tools for regret upper and lower bounds for data-driven decision-making problems and other general stochastic optimization problems.
Machine Learning (cs.LG); Optimization and Control (math.OC)
arXiv:2407.04900 [cs.LG]
(or arXiv:2407.04900v2 [cs.LG] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.04900 Focus to learn more arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
Full text under the publisher's open licence · 338 words
Related coverage
Towards Optimal Inventory Control under Censored Demand: A Biased Sample-Average Approximation Approach
arXiv · Oct 1, 2026
Synthesis Superintelligence: from Semiconductors to Superconductors — Periodic Labs’ Liam Fedus and Ekin Dogus Cubuk
Latent Space · Oct 8, 2026

XtalPi Holdings Limited: XtalPi Holdings Announces 2026 Interim Results
finanznachrichten.de · Aug 19, 2026

GEM Training: How Meta Doubled the Efficiency of Its LLM-Scale Ads Foundation Model
Meta Engineering · Aug 3, 2026